• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经直肠给予米索前列醇与肌内注射缩宫素预防原发性产后出血的效果比较

Effectiveness of Per Rectal Misoprostol Versus Intramuscular Oxytocin for Prevention of Primary Postpartum Haemorrhage.

作者信息

Asmat Raheela, Ashraf Tasneem, Asmat Fazila, Asmat Shakila, Asmat Nagina

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta.

Department of Paediatrics, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Jan;27(1):13-17.

PMID:28292361
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of per rectal misoprostol over oxytocin in primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH).

STUDY DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

Gynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Unit IV, Bolan Medical Complex Hospital, Quetta, from September 2013 to February 2014.

METHODOLOGY

Emergency obstetric patients receiving per rectal misoprostol (800 µgm) were named as group 'A' and those receiving 10 units oxytocin intramuscularly were labelled as group 'B'. The patients were followed within 24 hours of spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Pads soaked were used to assess the amount of blood loss.

RESULTS

A total of 1,678 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients in group-A was 29.11 years while the mean age of patients in group-B was 29.16 years. One hundred and twenty-three (14.66%) patients in group-A and 120 (14.31%) patients in group-B had PPH. Among the total 1,678 patients, 243 (14.49%) had postpartum haemorrhage among whom 24 (9.88%) had major haemorrhage with a blood loss ≥1000 mL. Among the sub-group (839 patients) administered misoprostol had 123 (14.66%) patients with blood loss greater than 500 mL and the rest 716 patients (85.34%) had blood loss less than 500 mL. The sub-group administered oxytocin have 120 (14.31%) out of 839 patients with postpartum haemorrhage while 719 (85.69%) had blood loss less than 500 mL.

CONCLUSION

Active management of 3rd stage of labour with per rectal misoprostol administration was as effective as intramuscular oxytocin. Both were equally effective to reduce PPH and the subsequent need for surgical interventions.

摘要

目的

比较直肠给予米索前列醇与催产素治疗原发性产后出血(PPH)的效果。

研究设计

随机对照试验研究。

研究地点及时间

2013年9月至2014年2月,在奎达市博拉纳综合医院妇产科第四单元。

方法

直肠给予米索前列醇(800微克)的急诊产科患者被命名为“A组”,肌肉注射10单位催产素的患者被标记为“B组”。在自然阴道分娩后24小时内对患者进行随访。使用浸湿的卫生巾评估失血量。

结果

共有1678名患者纳入研究。A组患者的平均年龄为29.11岁,而B组患者的平均年龄为29.16岁。A组有123名(14.66%)患者发生PPH,B组有120名(14.31%)患者发生PPH。在总共1678名患者中,243名(14.49%)发生产后出血,其中24名(9.88%)发生大出血,失血量≥1000毫升。在接受米索前列醇治疗的亚组(839名患者)中,有123名(14.66%)患者失血量大于500毫升,其余716名患者(85.34%)失血量小于500毫升。接受催产素治疗的亚组中,839名患者中有120名(14.31%)发生产后出血,而719名(85.69%)患者失血量小于500毫升。

结论

直肠给予米索前列醇对第三产程进行积极管理与肌肉注射催产素效果相同。两者在减少PPH及后续手术干预需求方面同样有效。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Per Rectal Misoprostol Versus Intramuscular Oxytocin for Prevention of Primary Postpartum Haemorrhage.经直肠给予米索前列醇与肌内注射缩宫素预防原发性产后出血的效果比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017 Jan;27(1):13-17.
2
Rectal misoprostol versus intramuscular oxytocin for prevention of post partum hemorrhage.直肠用米索前列醇与肌肉注射缩宫素预防产后出血的比较
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2011 Jan-Mar;9(33):8-12. doi: 10.3126/kumj.v9i1.6254.
3
Comparative study between rectally administered misoprostol as a prophylaxis versus conventional intramuscular oxytocin in post partum hemorrhage.直肠给药米索前列醇预防产后出血与传统肌肉注射缩宫素的对比研究。
Mymensingh Med J. 2009 Jan;18(1 Suppl):S40-44.
4
A randomised controlled trial of sublingual misoprostol and intramuscular oxytocin for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage.一项关于舌下含服米索前列醇与肌内注射缩宫素预防产后出血的随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;33(3):277-9. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2012.755503.
5
Sublingual misoprostol versus intramuscular oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in low-risk women.舌下含服米索前列醇与肌肉注射缩宫素预防低危产妇产后出血的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Feb;116(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
6
Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol or oxytocin: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.舌下含服米索前列醇或缩宫素预防产后出血:一项双盲随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):975-82; discussion 982-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03341.x.
7
Oxytocin via Uniject (a prefilled single-use injection) versus oral misoprostol for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage at the community level: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.依托孕素注射液(一种预充式单次使用注射器)与口服米索前列醇预防社区产妇产后出血:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jan;4(1):e37-44. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00219-3.
8
Rectal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery.直肠用米索前列醇与静脉用缩宫素预防阴道分娩后产后出血的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):878-82. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117360.
9
A prospective study to compare the effectiveness of adjunctive rectal misoprostol or oxytocin titration in the prevention of primary post-partum haemorrhage in at risk patients.一项前瞻性研究,比较直肠给予米索前列醇或缩宫素滴定法在预防高危患者原发性产后出血中的有效性。
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Mar;19(1):1517-1524. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i1.25.
10
A randomized comparison of rectal misoprostol with syntometrine on blood loss in the third stage of labour.直肠用米索前列醇与卡前列素氨丁三醇在第三产程失血方面的随机对照比较。
West Indian Med J. 2009 Jun;58(3):201-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence, mortality, and factors associated with primary postpartum haemorrhage following in-hospital births in northwest Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部院内分娩后原发性产后出血的发生率、死亡率及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 6;17(4):e0266345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266345. eCollection 2022.
2
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis.预防产后出血的宫缩剂:一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 19;12(12):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub3.
3
Uterotonic agents for preventing postpartum haemorrhage: a network meta-analysis.
预防产后出血的宫缩剂:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011689. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011689.pub2.