Amr B, Miles G, Shahtahmassebi G, Roobottom C, Stell D A
Peninsula HPB Unit, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK; Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth PL6 8BU, UK.
Peninsula Radiology Academy, Plymouth International Business Park, Plymouth PL6 5WR, UK.
Clin Radiol. 2017 Aug;72(8):691.e11-691.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
To determine the relative significance of radiological signs in determining the resectability of peri-ampullary cancer (PC) and to assess the value of multi-phase imaging in detecting these findings.
Blinded, double re-reporting of preoperative imaging from five hospitals was undertaken of 411 patients undergoing surgery for PC over an 8-year period, of whom 119 patients were found to be inoperable at the time of surgery.
The median tumour size was 26.7 mm and the proportion of patients reported to have regional lymphadenopathy (RL), venous (VI) and arterial involvement (AI) was 24.7%, 11.5%, and 3.9%, respectively and was similar regardless of the number of contrast phases undertaken. Significant associations were, however, noted between individual risk factors: VI was closely associated with tumour size (p=0.002) and AI (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis AI, VI, and RL were independently associated with resectability (relative risk of resection=0.05, 0.31, and 0.51, respectively). Tumour size, however, was not associated with resectability when VI was included in the multivariate model.
The use of multiple vascular contrast phases has no measureable impact on the rate of determination of tumour resectability of PC. In preoperative staging, AI is the most significant adverse finding for resectability. Large tumour diameter is not an adverse finding in isolation from other risk factors.
确定影像学征象在判定壶腹周围癌(PC)可切除性中的相对重要性,并评估多期成像在检测这些表现方面的价值。
对五家医院411例接受PC手术患者的术前成像进行盲法、双人重复报告,这些患者是在8年期间接受手术的,其中119例患者在手术时被发现无法手术切除。
肿瘤中位大小为26.7毫米,报告有区域淋巴结病(RL)、静脉(VI)和动脉受累(AI)的患者比例分别为24.7%、11.5%和3.9%,且无论进行的对比期数如何,该比例相似。然而,在个体危险因素之间发现了显著关联:VI与肿瘤大小密切相关(p=0.002)和AI(p<0.0001)。在多变量分析中,AI、VI和RL与可切除性独立相关(切除的相对风险分别为0.05、0.31和0.51)。然而,当VI纳入多变量模型时,肿瘤大小与可切除性无关。
使用多个血管对比期对PC肿瘤可切除性的判定率没有可测量的影响。在术前分期中,AI是可切除性最显著的不良表现。与其他危险因素无关时,大肿瘤直径不是不良表现。