Department of Endodontics, Case Western Reserve University, School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Endodontics, Case Western Reserve University, School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Endod. 2017 May;43(5):728-732. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
The aim of the current investigation was to assess the effect of the use of a dental operating microscope on the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment (NS RCT) while treating the mesiobuccal (MB) root of the maxillary first molar.
This retrospective investigation included endodontically treated maxillary first molars (ETMs) with apparent adequate previous NS RCT and restorations referred for endodontic retreatment at the endodontic graduate clinic. Inclusion criteria were ETMs that were diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis and normal periapical tissues before the initial NS RCT and ETMs that presented with a minimum of 1 identifiable periapical lesion (PAR) at 1 of the roots at the time of retreatment. One hundred ninety-five ETMs were included and divided into 2 groups: (1) the initial NS RCT had been performed using a microscope (n = 83) and (2) NS RCT had been performed without the use of a microscope (n = 112). Data extracted were whether the second MB (MB2) canal was located initially and the presence of an MB PAR at the time of retreatment. Data were statistically analyzed using binary logistic regression (α = 0.05).
The MB root was 3 times more likely to present with a PAR at the time of retreatment if the initial NS RCT was performed without the use of a microscope (P < .05, odds ratio = 3.1). There was a significant association between a missed MB2 canal and an MB PAR in the group in which the initial NS RCT was performed without the use of a microscope (P < .05, odds ratio = 5.1). However, in cases in which the initial NS RCT was performed using a microscope, a missed MB2 canal was not associated with the presence of an MB PAR.
With proper education, dentists can gain further insight into recognizing limitations in treating cases that require advanced training and advanced optics such as a microscope. Based on this strategy, it would appear that the outcome of NS RCT can be improved.
本研究旨在评估在治疗上颌第一磨牙近中颊(MB)根时使用牙科手术显微镜对非手术根管治疗(NS RCT)结果的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了在牙髓病学研究生诊所因根管再治疗而转诊的既往 NS RCT 后有充分疗效且有完整修复体的上颌第一磨牙(ETM)。纳入标准为:初始 NS RCT 前诊断为不可复性牙髓炎且根尖周组织正常的 ETM;再治疗时至少有 1 个根存在 1 个可识别的根尖病变(PAR)。共纳入 195 个 ETM,分为 2 组:(1)初始 NS RCT 时使用显微镜(n=83);(2)初始 NS RCT 时未使用显微镜(n=112)。提取的数据包括是否初次定位到第二 MB(MB2)根管以及再治疗时是否存在 MB PAR。采用二项逻辑回归(α=0.05)进行统计学分析。
如果初始 NS RCT 时未使用显微镜,则 MB 根在再治疗时更有可能出现 PAR(P<.05,优势比=3.1)。在初始 NS RCT 时未使用显微镜的组中,未发现 MB2 根管与 MB PAR 之间存在显著关联(P<.05,优势比=5.1)。然而,在初始 NS RCT 使用显微镜的情况下,未发现 MB2 根管与 MB PAR 的存在无关。
通过适当的教育,牙医可以更深入地了解在需要高级培训和高级光学设备(如显微镜)的情况下治疗病例的局限性。基于这一策略,NS RCT 的结果似乎可以得到改善。