Martin Angela S, Chang Jeani, Zhang Yujia, Kawwass Jennifer F, Boulet Sheree L, McKane Patricia, Bernson Dana, Kissin Dmitry M, Jamieson Denise J
Emory University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Atlanta, Georgia; Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
To examine outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived without assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) compared with singletons conceived with ART by elective single-embryo transfer (eSET), nonelective single-embryo transfer (non-eSET), and double-embryo transfer with the establishment of 1 (DET -1) or ≥2 (DET ≥2) early fetal heartbeats.
Retrospective cohort using linked ART surveillance data and vital records from Florida, Massachusetts, Michigan, and Connecticut.
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S): Singleton live-born infants.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preterm birth (PTB <37 weeks), very preterm birth (VPTB <32 weeks), small for gestational age birth weight (<10th percentile), low birth weight (LBW <2,500 g), very low birth weight (VLBW <1,500 g), 5-minute Apgar score <7, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.
RESULT(S): After controlling for maternal characteristics and employing a weighted propensity score approach, we found that singletons conceived after eSET were less likely to have a 5-minute Apgar <7 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.69) compared with non-ART singletons. There were no differences among outcomes between non-ART and non-eSET infants. We found that PTB, VPTB, LBW, and VLBW were more likely among DET -1 and DET ≥2 compared with non-ART infants, with the odds being higher for DET ≥2 (PTB aOR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.09-2.29; VPTB aOR 2.46; 95% CI, 1.20-5.04; LBW aOR 2.17; 95% CI, 1.24-3.79; VLBW aOR 3.67; 95% CI, 1.38-9.77).
CONCLUSION(S): Compared with non-ART singletons, singletons born after eSET and non-eSET did not have increased risks whereas DET -1 and DET ≥2 singletons were more likely to have adverse perinatal outcomes.
比较未经辅助生殖技术(非ART)受孕的单胎妊娠与通过选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)、非选择性单胚胎移植(非eSET)以及双胚胎移植且成功建立1个(DET -1)或≥2个(DET≥2)早期胎心的单胎妊娠的结局。
利用来自佛罗里达州、马萨诸塞州、密歇根州和康涅狄格州的关联ART监测数据和生命记录进行回顾性队列研究。
不适用。
单胎活产婴儿。
无。
早产(PTB<37周)、极早产(VPTB<32周)、小于胎龄儿出生体重(<第10百分位数)、低出生体重(LBW<2500g)、极低出生体重(VLBW<1500g)、5分钟Apgar评分<7以及新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院情况。
在控制产妇特征并采用加权倾向评分法后,我们发现与非ART单胎相比,eSET后受孕的单胎5分钟Apgar评分<7的可能性较小(调整优势比[aOR]为0.33;95%可信区间[CI],0.15 - 0.69)。非ART和非eSET婴儿的结局之间没有差异。我们发现,与非ART婴儿相比,DET -1和DET≥2的单胎中PTB、VPTB、LBW和VLBW的发生可能性更高,DET≥2的几率更高(PTB的aOR为1.58;95%CI,1.09 - 2.29;VPTB的aOR为2.46;95%CI,1.20 - 5.04;LBW的aOR为2.17;95%CI,1.24 - 3.79;VLBW的aOR为3.67;95%CI,1.38 - 9.77)。
与非ART单胎相比,eSET和非eSET后出生的单胎没有增加风险,而DET -1和DET≥2的单胎更有可能出现不良围产期结局。