Frey Jordan D, Poudrier Grace, Chiodo Michael V, Hazen Alexes
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, N.Y.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Dec 23;4(12):e1131. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001131. eCollection 2016 Dec.
The complex anatomy and function of the native penis is difficult to surgically replicate. Metoidioplasty and radial forearm flap phalloplasty (RFFP) are the 2 most commonly utilized procedures for transgender neophallus construction.
A MEDLINE search for metoidioplasty and RFFP in female-to-male genital reconstruction was performed. Primary outcome measures were subsequently compared. A systematic review was planned in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse guidelines. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was utilized to evaluate the quality of evidence.
Using Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes tool criteria, a total of 188 articles were identified; 7 articles related to metoidioplasty and 11 articles related to RFFP met inclusion criteria. The GRADE quality of evidence was low to very low for all included studies. In studies examining metoidioplasty, the average study size and length of follow-up were 54 patients and 4.6 years, respectively (1 study did not report [NR]). Eighty-eight percent underwent a single-stage reconstruction (0 NR), 87% reported an aesthetic neophallus (3 NR), and 100% reported erogenous sensation (2 NR). Fifty-one percent of patients reported successful intercourse (3 NR), and 89% of patients achieved standing micturition (3 NR). In studies examining RFFP, the average study size and follow-up were 60.4 patients and 6.23 years, respectively (6 NR). No patients underwent single-stage reconstructions (8 NR). Seventy percent of patients reported a satisfactorily aesthetic neophallus (4 NR), and 69% reported erogenous sensation (6 NR). Forty-three percent reported successful penetration of partner during intercourse (6 NR), and 89% achieved standing micturition (6 NR). Compared with RFFP, metoidioplasty was significantly more likely to be completed in a single stage ( < 0.0001), have an aesthetic result ( = 0.0002), maintain erogenous sensation ( < 0.0001), achieve standing micturition ( = 0.001), and have a lower overall complication rate ( = 0.02).
Although the current literature suggests that metoidioplasty is more likely to yield an "ideal" neophallus compared with RFFP, any conclusion is severely limited by the low quality of available evidence.
天然阴茎复杂的解剖结构和功能难以通过手术复制。阴蒂成形术和桡侧前臂游离皮瓣阴茎成形术(RFFP)是变性男性阴茎再造最常用的两种手术方法。
对女性变男性生殖器重建中阴蒂成形术和RFFP进行了医学文献数据库检索。随后比较了主要结局指标。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南计划进行系统评价。采用推荐分级评估、制定和评价(GRADE)来评估证据质量。
根据人群、干预措施、对照和结局工具标准,共识别出188篇文章;7篇与阴蒂成形术相关,11篇与RFFP相关,符合纳入标准。所有纳入研究的GRADE证据质量均为低至极低。在研究阴蒂成形术的研究中,平均研究规模和随访时间分别为54例患者和4.6年(1项研究未报告[NR])。88%的患者接受了一期重建(0项未报告),87%的患者报告阴茎外观美观(3项未报告),100%的患者报告有性快感(2项未报告)。51%的患者报告性交成功(3项未报告),89%的患者能够站立排尿(3项未报告)。在研究RFFP的研究中,平均研究规模和随访时间分别为60.4例患者和6.23年(6项未报告)。没有患者接受一期重建(8项未报告)。70%的患者报告阴茎外观令人满意(4项未报告),69%的患者报告有性快感(6项未报告)。43%的患者报告性交时能成功插入性伴侣(6项未报告),89%的患者能够站立排尿(6项未报告)。与RFFP相比,阴蒂成形术更有可能在一期完成(P<0.0001),获得美观效果(P = 0.0002),维持性快感(P<0.0001),实现站立排尿(P = 0.001),且总体并发症发生率更低(P = 0.02)。
尽管目前的文献表明,与RFFP相比,阴蒂成形术更有可能产生“理想”的阴茎,但现有证据质量较低,严重限制了任何结论的得出。