• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估澳大利亚星级健康评级的结构有效性:营养成分谱诊断准确性研究。

Assessment of the construct validity of the Australian Health Star Rating: a nutrient profiling diagnostic accuracy study.

机构信息

School of Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov;71(11):1353-1359. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.23. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2017.23
PMID:28294168
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Nutrient profiling models classify the healthiness of foods based on their nutritional composition and provide the science that underlies nutrition signposting schemes. The two objectives were to examine the construct validity of the Health Star Rating (HSR) system by determining its diagnostic accuracy and to detect the optimal HSR cutoff points to define healthiness in packaged dairy foods. We hypothesised that ultra-processed dairy, defined by NOVA, would have less stars (less healthy) and non-ultra-processed dairy would have more stars (more healthy).

SUBJECTS/METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of the HSR system used for 621 dairy foods for sale in an Australian regional supermarket was investigated. The healthiness of packaged dairy was measured using the NOVA food classification system.

RESULTS

The dairy beverages model was found to discriminate between healthy and less healthy dairy beverages as classified by NOVA (AUC: 0.653; 95% CI: 0.556-0.750; P=0.005). A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for dairy beverages demonstrated that the optimal cutoff point corresponded to a rating of four stars. There was no discrimination power when using the HSR for predicting the health value of yoghurt and other dairy, or cheeses.

CONCLUSIONS

At the optimal cutoff point of four stars the HSR has a high sensitivity but a low specificity to correctly classify healthy packaged dairy beverages, as defined by NOVA. We provide evidence to support the construct validity of the HSR model for dairy beverages, but not for the models used for yoghurts and other dairy products, or cheeses.

摘要

背景/目的:营养成分分析模型根据食物的营养成分对其健康程度进行分类,并为营养标志计划提供科学依据。本研究的两个目的是通过确定健康星级评分(HSR)系统的诊断准确性来检验其结构有效性,并检测用于定义包装乳制品健康程度的最佳 HSR 切点。我们假设,超加工乳制品(由 NOVA 定义)的星级评分较低(健康程度较低),而非超加工乳制品的星级评分较高(健康程度较高)。

受试者/方法:对澳大利亚一家地区超市销售的 621 种乳制品的 HSR 系统的诊断准确性进行了研究。使用 NOVA 食品分类系统对包装乳制品的健康程度进行了测量。

结果

研究发现,乳制品饮料模型能够区分 NOVA 分类的健康和不健康乳制品饮料(AUC:0.653;95%CI:0.556-0.750;P=0.005)。对乳制品饮料进行的受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,最佳切点对应四星评级。使用 HSR 预测酸奶和其他乳制品或奶酪的健康价值时,没有判别能力。

结论

在最佳的四星切点,HSR 对 NOVA 定义的健康包装乳制品饮料的正确分类具有较高的敏感性,但特异性较低。我们提供的证据支持 HSR 模型对乳制品饮料的结构有效性,但不支持用于酸奶和其他乳制品产品或奶酪的模型。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the construct validity of the Australian Health Star Rating: a nutrient profiling diagnostic accuracy study.评估澳大利亚星级健康评级的结构有效性:营养成分谱诊断准确性研究。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Nov;71(11):1353-1359. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.23. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
2
Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing.分析食品加工水平对澳大利亚星级健康评级系统的使用情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Dec 13;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7.
3
Comparing product healthiness according to the Health Star Rating and the NOVA classification system and implications for food labelling systems: An analysis of 25 486 products in Australia.根据健康星级评分和 NOVA 分类系统比较产品健康度,以及对食品标签系统的影响:对澳大利亚 25486 种产品的分析。
Nutr Bull. 2023 Dec;48(4):523-534. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12640. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
4
Investigating nutrient profiling and Health Star Ratings on core dairy products in Australia.澳大利亚核心乳制品的营养成分分析及健康星级评定研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(15):2860-5. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016000975. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
An Evaluation of the Healthiness of the Indian Packaged Food and Beverage Supply.印度包装食品和饮料供应的健康评估。
Nutrients. 2017 Oct 9;9(10):1103. doi: 10.3390/nu9101103.
6
A comparison of the Health Star Rating system when used for restaurant fast foods and packaged foods.用于餐厅快餐和包装食品时的健康星级评定系统比较。
Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
7
Change in the Healthiness of Foods Sold in an Australian Supermarket Chain Following Implementation of a Shelf Tag Intervention Based on the Health Star Rating System.澳大利亚连锁超市实施货架标签干预措施(基于健康星级评分系统)后销售食品的健康度变化。
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 9;14(12):2394. doi: 10.3390/nu14122394.
8
Comparison of Nutri-Score and Health Star Rating Nutrient Profiling Models Using Large Branded Foods Composition Database and Sales Data.比较 Nutri-Score 和健康星级评分营养素分析模型,使用大型品牌食品成分数据库和销售数据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 23;20(5):3980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20053980.
9
Evaluation of Alignment between the Health Claims Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC) and the Health Star Rating (HSR) Nutrient Profiling Models.评价健康声称营养素评分标准(NPSC)与健康之星评级(HSR)营养素评分模型之间的一致性。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 10;10(8):1065. doi: 10.3390/nu10081065.
10
Deconstructing the Supermarket: Systematic Ingredient Disaggregation and the Association between Ingredient Usage and Product Health Indicators for 24,229 Australian Foods and Beverages.解构超市:24229 种澳大利亚食品和饮料的成分细分与成分使用和产品健康指标之间的关联的系统分析。
Nutrients. 2021 May 31;13(6):1882. doi: 10.3390/nu13061882.

引用本文的文献

1
Fifteen Years of NOVA Food-Processing Classification: "Friend or Foe" Among Sustainable Diet Indicators? A Scoping Review.十五年的新食物加工分类:可持续饮食指标中的“朋友还是敌人”?一项范围综述
Nutr Rev. 2025 Apr 1;83(4):771-791. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae207.
2
Switches in food and beverage product purchases can reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Australia.食品和饮料产品购买习惯的改变可以减少澳大利亚的温室气体排放。
Nat Food. 2024 Jun;5(6):524-532. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00971-6. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Balanced Hybrid Nutrient Density Score Compared to Nutri-Score and Health Star Rating Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analyses.

本文引用的文献

1
Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada.在加拿大,超加工食品的消费情况可预测饮食质量。
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
2
Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the US diet: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study.美国饮食中的超加工食品和添加糖:一项具有全国代表性的横断面研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 9;6(3):e009892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009892.
3
Food Classification Systems Based on Food Processing: Significance and Implications for Policies and Actions: A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment.
使用受试者工作特征曲线分析,将平衡混合营养密度评分与营养评分和健康星级评定进行比较。
Front Nutr. 2022 May 2;9:867096. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.867096. eCollection 2022.
4
Australian Consumers Are Willing to Pay for the Health Star Rating Front-of-Pack Nutrition Label.澳大利亚消费者愿意为营养标签前置评级系统(Health Star Rating)买单。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):3876. doi: 10.3390/nu12123876.
5
Energy Density of New Food Products Targeted to Children.儿童食品新产品的能量密度。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 27;12(8):2242. doi: 10.3390/nu12082242.
6
Analysing the use of the Australian Health Star Rating system by level of food processing.分析食品加工水平对澳大利亚星级健康评级系统的使用情况。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Dec 13;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0760-7.
7
Alignment of Supermarket Own Brand Foods' Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling with Measures of Nutritional Quality: An Australian Perspective.超市自有品牌食品的营养标签与营养质量衡量标准的一致性:澳大利亚视角。
Nutrients. 2018 Oct 9;10(10):1465. doi: 10.3390/nu10101465.
8
Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study.比较用于评估食品营养质量的营养成分分析模型:验证研究。
Br J Nutr. 2018 Sep;120(5):567-582. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001575. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
基于食品加工的食品分类系统:对政策和行动的意义和影响:系统文献回顾和评估。
Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Jun;3(2):256-72. doi: 10.1007/s13679-014-0092-0.
4
Current food classifications in epidemiological studies do not enable solid nutritional recommendations for preventing diet-related chronic diseases: the impact of food processing.流行病学研究中当前的食物分类无法为预防与饮食相关的慢性病提供可靠的营养建议:食品加工的影响。
Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):629-38. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008789. Print 2015 Nov.
5
Impact of ultra-processed foods on micronutrient content in the Brazilian diet.超加工食品对巴西饮食中微量营养素含量的影响。
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:45. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006211. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
Consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Brazilian adolescents and adults.巴西青少年和成年人中超加工食品的消费与肥胖问题
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.07.018. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Dietary guidelines to nourish humanity and the planet in the twenty-first century. A blueprint from Brazil.21世纪滋养人类和地球的饮食指南。来自巴西的蓝图。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2311-22. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002165. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
8
Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil.巴西的超加工食品与营养膳食状况
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:38. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006132. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
9
Application of the British Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system in a French food composition database.英国食品标准局营养成分分析系统在法国食品成分数据库中的应用。
Br J Nutr. 2014 Nov 28;112(10):1699-705. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514002761. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
10
Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children's lipid profiles: a longitudinal study.超加工食品的消费及其对儿童血脂谱的影响:一项纵向研究。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan;25(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 20.