Manelis Anna, Popov Vencislav, Paynter Christopher, Walsh Matthew, Wheeler Mark E, Vogt Keith M, Reder Lynne M
1 University of Pittsburgh.
2 Carnegie Mellon University.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1253-1266. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01123. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
We examined the neurobiological basis of temporal resetting, an aspect of temporal order memory, using a version of the delayed-match-to-multiple-sample task. While in an fMRI scanner, participants evaluated whether an item was novel or whether it had appeared before or after a reset event that signified the start of a new block of trials. Participants responded "old" to items that were repeated within the current block and "new" to both novel items and items that had last appeared before the reset event (pseudonew items). Medial-temporal, prefrontal, and occipital regions responded to absolute novelty of the stimulus-they differentiated between novel items and previously seen items, but not between old and pseudonew items. Activation for pseudonew items in the frontopolar and parietal regions, in contrast, was intermediate between old and new items. The posterior cingulate cortex extending to precuneus was the only region that showed complete temporal resetting, and its activation reflected whether an item was new or old according to the task instructions regardless of its familiarity. There was also a significant Condition (old/pseudonew) × Familiarity (second/third presentations) interaction effect on behavioral and neural measures. For pseudonew items, greater familiarity decreased response accuracy, increased RTs, increased ACC activation, and increased functional connectivity between ACC and the left frontal pole. The reverse was observed for old items. On the basis of these results, we propose a theoretical framework in which temporal resetting relies on an episodic retrieval network that is modulated by cognitive control and conflict resolution.
我们使用一种延迟匹配多样本任务的变体,研究了时间重置(时间顺序记忆的一个方面)的神经生物学基础。在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中,参与者评估一个项目是新颖的,还是在表示新试验块开始的重置事件之前或之后出现过。参与者对当前块内重复出现的项目回答“旧”,对新颖项目和在重置事件之前最后出现的项目(伪新项目)回答“新”。内侧颞叶、前额叶和枕叶区域对刺激的绝对新颖性有反应——它们区分新颖项目和先前见过的项目,但不区分旧项目和伪新项目。相比之下,额极和顶叶区域对伪新项目的激活介于旧项目和新项目之间。延伸至楔前叶的后扣带回皮质是唯一显示出完全时间重置的区域,其激活反映了根据任务指令一个项目是新还是旧,而不管其熟悉程度如何。在行为和神经测量方面,也存在显著的条件(旧/伪新)×熟悉度(第二次/第三次呈现)交互效应。对于伪新项目,更高的熟悉度会降低反应准确性、增加反应时间、增加前扣带回皮质的激活,并增加前扣带回皮质与左额极之间的功能连接。对于旧项目则观察到相反的情况。基于这些结果,我们提出了一个理论框架,其中时间重置依赖于一个由认知控制和冲突解决调节的情景检索网络。