• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《综合初级保健倡议的改良以患者为中心的医疗之家评估的制定与验证》。

Development and Validation of the Modified Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment for the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ.

Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):944-973. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12673. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12673
PMID:28295249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5867087/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the modified Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment (M-PCMH-A) survey module developed to track primary care practices' care delivery approaches over time, assess whether its underlying factor structure is reliable, and produce factor scores that provide a more reliable summary measure of the practice's care delivery than would a simple average of question responses.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Survey data collected from diverse practices participating in the Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative in 2012 (n = 497) and 2014 (n = 493) and matched comparison practices in 2014 (n = 423).

STUDY DESIGN

Confirmatory factor analysis.

DATA COLLECTION

Thirty-eight questions organized in six domains: Access and Continuity of Care, Planned Care for Chronic Conditions and Preventive Care, Risk-Stratified Care Management, Patient and Caregiver Engagement, Coordination of Care across the Medical Neighborhood, and Continuous Data-Driven Improvement.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Confirmatory factor analysis suggested using seven factors (splitting one domain into two), reassigning two questions to different domain factors, and removing one question, resulting in high reliability, construct validity, and stability in all but one factor. The seven factors together formed a single higher-order factor summary measure. Factor scores guard against potential biases from equal weighting.

CONCLUSIONS

The M-PCMH-A can validly and reliably track primary care delivery across practices and over time using factors representing seven key components of care as well as an overall score. Researchers should calculate factor loadings for their specific data if possible, but average scores may be suitable if they cannot use factor analysis due to resource or sample constraints.

摘要

目的

描述经过修改的以患者为中心的医疗之家评估(M-PCMH-A)调查模块,该模块用于跟踪初级保健实践的护理提供方法随时间的变化,评估其潜在的因子结构是否可靠,并产生因子分数,为实践的护理提供比简单平均问题回答更可靠的综合衡量标准。

数据来源/研究环境:2012 年(n=497)和 2014 年(n=493)参加综合初级保健(CPC)计划的各种实践以及 2014 年匹配的比较实践中收集的调查数据(n=423)。

研究设计

验证性因子分析。

数据收集

38 个问题分为六个领域:获得和连续护理、慢性病和预防保健计划护理、风险分层护理管理、患者和护理人员参与、医疗邻里间的协调护理以及持续数据驱动的改进。

主要发现

验证性因子分析表明,使用七个因素(将一个域拆分为两个),将两个问题重新分配给不同的域因素,并删除一个问题,除了一个因素外,其余所有因素都具有较高的可靠性、结构有效性和稳定性。这七个因素共同构成了一个单一的高阶因素综合衡量标准。因子分数可以防止由于加权相等而产生的潜在偏差。

结论

M-PCMH-A 可以使用代表护理七个关键组成部分的因素以及总体得分,在实践和随时间跟踪初级保健的提供情况,具有有效性和可靠性。如果可能的话,研究人员应计算其特定数据的因子载荷,但如果由于资源或样本限制而无法使用因子分析,则平均得分可能是合适的。

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of the Modified Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment for the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.《综合初级保健倡议的改良以患者为中心的医疗之家评估的制定与验证》。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):944-973. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12673. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Patient Experience of Chronic Illness Care and Medical Home Transformation in Safety Net Clinics.患者在医疗保障诊所中对慢性病护理和医疗家庭转型的体验。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb;53(1):469-488. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12608. Epub 2017 May 30.
3
Assessing progress toward becoming a patient-centered medical home: an assessment tool for practice transformation.评估向以患者为中心的医疗之家转变的进展:实践转型评估工具。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1879-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12111. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
4
Development and validation of the Medical Home Care Coordination Survey for assessing care coordination in the primary care setting from the patient and provider perspectives.医疗居家护理协调调查的开发与验证:从患者和提供者的角度评估初级护理环境中的护理协调情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 7;15:226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0893-1.
5
The patient-centered medical home: a reality for HIV care in Nigeria.以患者为中心的医疗之家:尼日利亚艾滋病护理的现实情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):654-661. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx083.
6
Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC).慢性病照护患者评估量表(PACIC)的开发与验证
Med Care. 2005 May;43(5):436-44. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c.
7
Availability of Care Concordant With Patient-centered Medical Home Principles Among Those With Chronic Conditions: Measuring Care Outcomes.慢性病患者中符合以患者为中心的医疗之家原则的医疗可及性:衡量医疗结果
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):262-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000498.
8
Key attributes of patient centered medical homes associated with patient activation of diabetes patients.与糖尿病患者的患者激活相关的以患者为中心的医疗之家的关键属性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 5;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0704-3.
9
Impact of the Rochester Medical Home Initiative on Primary Care Practices, Quality, Utilization, and Costs.罗切斯特医疗之家倡议对初级保健实践、质量、利用情况和成本的影响。
Med Care. 2015 Nov;53(11):967-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000424.
10
Are primary care practices ready to become patient-centered medical homes?基层医疗实践是否已准备好成为以患者为中心的医疗之家?
J Rural Health. 2013 Spring;29(2):180-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2012.00433.x. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Building Community Health Center Teams: Evaluating the Impact of Team Training.组建社区卫生中心团队:评估团队培训的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr 21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09523-5.
2
Organizational and patient factors associated with positive primary care experiences for veterans with current or recent homelessness.与当前或近期无家可归退伍军人积极的初级保健体验相关的组织因素和患者因素。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14359. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14359. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study.优化初级保健改进中的患者伙伴关系:一项定性研究。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021;46(2):123-134. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250.
4
[Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].[基层医疗中以患者为中心的护理调查问卷。系统评价]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.综合初级保健倡议的两年成本和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
2
Assessing progress toward becoming a patient-centered medical home: an assessment tool for practice transformation.评估向以患者为中心的医疗之家转变的进展:实践转型评估工具。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1879-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12111. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
3
Testing the convergent and discriminant validity of the Decisional Balance Scale of the Transtheoretical Model using the Multi-Trait Multi-Method approach.采用多特质多方法 approach 检验跨理论模型决策平衡量表的收敛效度和区分效度。 注:原文中“approach”未明确翻译,可根据具体语境补充合适的词,比如“方法”等 。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2008 Jun;22(2):288-94. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.288.
4
Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework.自我报告工具能否在不同人群组之间进行有意义的比较?使用验证性因素分析框架检验测量不变性。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S78-94. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f.
5
Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research.验证性因素分析在测试验证研究中的效用。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Aug;55(4):584-594. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.584.
6
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.用于评估可重复性的一致性相关系数。
Biometrics. 1989 Mar;45(1):255-68.