• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[基层医疗中以患者为中心的护理调查问卷。系统评价]

[Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].

作者信息

Pascual López José Antonio, Gil Pérez Trinidad, Sánchez Sánchez Juan Antonio, Menárguez Puche Juan Francisco

机构信息

Centro de Salud docente de Calasparra, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Calasparra, Murcia, España.

Centro de Salud docente Mariano Yago, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Yecla, Murcia, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004
PMID:31883783
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054285/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Despite the acknowledged importance of 'Person Centered Care' (PCC), there are obvious limitations for its determination and measurement due to the difficulty of its exact definition. The objective of our review is to identify valid tools that measure the PCC or some of its aspects in the field of Primary Health Care.

DESIGN

Systematic review DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, PSYCinfo, IME-Biomedicine, LILACS and TESEO until May 31, 2018.

SELECTION OF STUDIES

The inclusion criteria were: validation studies of questionnaires, systematic reviews of validation or other descriptive studies, all of which were carried out in the context of the Primary Health Care and that measured aspects of the PCC in professionals and/or patients. Two investigators independently reviewed the articles and their discrepancies were resolved by a third investigator.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were collected on the measured ACP aspects, target population, type of questionnaire, and data on validity and reliability.

RESULTS

1,415 articles were located, to which 54 additional references were subsequently added via cross references. Finally, there were 75 articles that fulfilled all the criteria and there were 39 which had the tools identified and classified according to the dimensions analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the difficulty of measuring PCC as a whole, most of the articles refer only to one of its aspects or dimensions, with the patient's perspective prevailing over that of the professional. All these tools are, nevertheless, an important starting point for future questionnaires that attempt an integral approach to the PCC.

摘要

目的

尽管“以患者为中心的护理”(PCC)的重要性已得到公认,但由于其确切定义难以界定,在对其进行确定和衡量方面存在明显局限性。我们本次综述的目的是识别在初级卫生保健领域中用于衡量PCC或其某些方面的有效工具。

设计

系统综述

数据来源

截至2018年5月31日的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、PSYCinfo、IME - 生物医学、LILACS和TESEO。

研究选择

纳入标准为:问卷的验证研究、验证的系统综述或其他描述性研究,所有这些研究均在初级卫生保健背景下开展,且测量了专业人员和/或患者的PCC方面。两名研究人员独立审查文章,他们之间的分歧由第三名研究人员解决。

数据提取

收集了有关所测量的PCC方面、目标人群、问卷类型以及有效性和可靠性数据。

结果

共检索到1415篇文章,随后通过交叉引用又增加了54篇参考文献。最后,有75篇文章符合所有标准,有39篇文章拥有根据所分析维度确定并分类的工具。

结论

由于难以整体衡量PCC,大多数文章仅涉及其中一个方面或维度,患者视角比专业人员视角更为突出。然而,所有这些工具都是未来试图采用整体方法衡量PCC的问卷的重要起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/8054285/226536726745/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/8054285/cfc8cbb030e1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/8054285/226536726745/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/8054285/cfc8cbb030e1/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be31/8054285/226536726745/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
[Questionnaires of person centered care in primary care. A systematic review].[基层医疗中以患者为中心的护理调查问卷。系统评价]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):738-749. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
2
[How to assess Person-Centered Care according to professionals? A Delphi study].[专业人士如何评估以患者为中心的护理?一项德尔菲研究]
Aten Primaria. 2022 Jan;54(1):102232. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2021.102232. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
3
[Design and validation of the ACPAPS questionnaire to assess person-centred care by the family doctor].[用于评估家庭医生以患者为中心照护的 ACPAPS 问卷的设计与验证]
Aten Primaria. 2023 Dec;55(12):102739. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102739. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Person-Centered Care From a Relational Ethics Perspective for the Delivery of High Quality and Safe Healthcare: A Scoping Review.从关系伦理视角看以患者为中心的护理,以提供高质量和安全的医疗保健:一项范围综述
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 6;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044. eCollection 2020.
6
Person-Centered Care for Older Adults with Chronic Conditions and Functional Impairment: A Systematic Literature Review.针对患有慢性病和功能障碍的老年人的以患者为中心的护理:一项系统文献综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):e1-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13873. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
7
Person-centered care assessment tool with a focus on quality healthcare: a systematic review of psychometric properties.以关注优质医疗保健为重点的以人为本的护理评估工具:心理测量特性的系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;12(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01716-7.
8
A state-of-the-art review of direct observation tools for assessing competency in person-centred care.人本位护理能力评估直接观察工具的最新研究综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103634. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
A Systematic Review of Surveys for Measuring Patient-centered Care in the Hospital Setting.系统评价医院环境中用于测量以患者为中心的医疗服务的调查研究。
Med Care. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):228-237. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001474.
10
Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.拉丁美洲患者为中心的护理理念:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1820-1831. doi: 10.1111/hex.13797. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and validation of an instrument to evaluate Person-Centered care in health services.一种用于评估卫生服务中以患者为中心的护理的工具的设计与验证。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;82(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01324-2.
2
Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review.养老机构中 COVID-19 疫情的经验教训:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16919. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416919.
3
Person-centred care in individuals with stroke: a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

本文引用的文献

1
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Psychometric analysis of the Swedish version of the General Medical Council's multi source feedback questionnaires.英国医学总会多源反馈调查问卷瑞典语版本的心理测量分析
Int J Med Educ. 2017 Jul 10;8:252-261. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5948.0bb6.
3
Development and Validation of the Modified Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment for the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.
以个体为中心的脑卒中患者护理:一项采用深入访谈法的定性研究。
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):2167-2180. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2105393.
《综合初级保健倡议的改良以患者为中心的医疗之家评估的制定与验证》。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):944-973. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12673. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
4
Physician Enabling Skills Questionnaire: Validation of a newly developed instrument in primary health care.医生赋能技能问卷:一种新开发的初级卫生保健工具的验证
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):e517-23.
5
Development and validation of the Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool.日本版基层医疗评估工具的开发与验证
Fam Pract. 2016 Feb;33(1):112-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv087. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
6
GPAQ-R: development and psychometric properties of a version of the general practice assessment questionnaire for use for revalidation by general practitioners in the UK.GPAQ-R:英国全科医生再认证用一般实践评估问卷的修订版的开发和心理测量学特性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 20;14:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-160.
7
Validation of SURE, a four-item clinical checklist for detecting decisional conflict in patients.SURE的验证,一种用于检测患者决策冲突的四项临床检查表。
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):54-62. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13491463. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
8
A tool to evaluate patients' experiences of nursing care in Australian general practice: development of the Patient Enablement and Satisfaction Survey.一种评估澳大利亚全科医疗中患者护理体验的工具:患者赋能与满意度调查的开发
Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(2):209-15. doi: 10.1071/PY12121.
9
Validation of a patient-centered culturally sensitive health care provider inventory using a national sample of adult patients.采用全国成年患者样本对患者为中心的文化敏感型医疗服务提供者量表进行验证。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
10
Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.临床决策沟通障碍分析:医生和患者观点之间的差距
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):826-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00809.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.