Loethen Ashley A, Kerstenetzky Luiza, Descourouez Jillian L, Leverson Glen E, Smith Jeannina A, Jorgenson Margaret R
University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, Wisconsin.
Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin.
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 May;37(5):599-606. doi: 10.1002/phar.1924. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
To evaluate the use of fosfomycin (FOS) at the single-dose regimen approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as well as off-label multidose regimens for the treatment of cystitis after abdominal solid organ transplant (aSOT).
Retrospective study.
Tertiary academic medical center.
Adult inpatients with history of aSOT receiving FOS between January 1, 2009, and April 30, 2015, for the treatment of cystitis.
Seventy-six courses of FOS were identified in 64 patients. Overall treatment success was 85.5%, with 11 failed treatment courses. Enterococcus was isolated in 59.3% of courses, of which 72.2% were vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Gram-negative organisms comprised a quarter of isolated bacteria, with most resistant to three or more antimicrobial classes. In the 11 failed treatment courses, 90% were targeted against enterococcus, of which 82% were VRE. Six of these failures (54%) were successfully retreated with uroselective therapy (FOS or nitrofurantoin). No significant difference in the success rate of single-dose versus multidose therapy was seen (80.6% vs 90%, p=0.33). Concomitant systemic antibiotics for other indications were present in 36.8% of courses, and they were significantly more frequent in the multidose group (67.5% vs 47.2%, p=0.04). However, multivariable logistic regression analysis found that after adjustment for broad-spectrum antibiotic use, no statistically significant difference in failure rates was found between the two regimens (p=0.42).
FOS appears to be successful in the treatment of cystitis in aSOT recipients. Multidose therapy did not significantly improve success over a single-dose regimen. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the true efficacy of FOS in the aSOT population.
评估美国食品药品监督管理局批准的单剂量磷霉素(FOS)方案以及未按标签说明的多剂量方案用于治疗腹部实体器官移植(aSOT)后膀胱炎的效果。
回顾性研究。
三级学术医疗中心。
2009年1月1日至2015年4月30日期间接受FOS治疗膀胱炎的有aSOT病史的成年住院患者。
在64例患者中确定了76个FOS疗程。总体治疗成功率为85.5%,有11个疗程治疗失败。59.3%的疗程分离出肠球菌,其中72.2%是耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。革兰氏阴性菌占分离细菌的四分之一,大多数对三种或更多类抗菌药物耐药。在11个治疗失败的疗程中,90%针对肠球菌,其中82%是VRE。其中6例失败(54%)通过尿选择性治疗(FOS或呋喃妥因)成功治愈。单剂量与多剂量治疗的成功率未见显著差异(80.6%对90%,p=0.33)。36.8%的疗程同时使用了用于其他适应证的全身性抗生素,在多剂量组中更为常见(67.5%对47.2%,p=0.04)。然而,多变量逻辑回归分析发现,在调整了广谱抗生素的使用后,两种方案的失败率没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.42)。
FOS似乎能成功治疗aSOT受者的膀胱炎。多剂量治疗与单剂量方案相比,并未显著提高成功率。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来阐明FOS在aSOT人群中的真正疗效。