Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):569-577. doi: 10.1002/uog.17457. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the efficacy of cervical cerclage in preventing preterm birth (PTB) in asymptomatic singleton pregnancies with a short mid-trimester cervical length (CL) on transvaginal sonography (TVS) and without prior spontaneous PTB.
Electronic databases were searched from inception of each database until February 2017. No language restrictions were applied. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of asymptomatic singleton pregnancies without prior spontaneous PTB, found to have short CL < 25 mm on mid-trimester TVS and then randomized to management with either cerclage or no cerclage, were included. Corresponding authors of all the included trials were contacted to obtain access to the data and perform a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Data provided by the investigators were merged into a master database constructed specifically for the review. Primary outcome was PTB < 35 weeks. Summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% CI. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.
Five RCTs, including 419 asymptomatic singleton gestations with TVS-CL < 25 mm and without prior spontaneous PTB, were analyzed. In women who were randomized to the cerclage group compared with those in the control group, no statistically significant differences were found in PTB < 35 (21.9% vs 27.7%; RR, 0.88 (95% CI 0.63-1.23); I = 0%; five studies, 419 participants), < 34, < 32, < 28 and < 24 weeks, gestational age at delivery, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) and neonatal outcomes. In women who received cerclage compared with those who did not, planned subgroup analyses revealed a significantly lower rate of PTB < 35 weeks in women with TVS-CL < 10 mm (39.5% vs 58.0%; RR, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.47-0.98); I = 0%; five studies; 126 participants) and in women who received tocolytics (17.5% vs 32.7%; RR, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.31-0.93); I = 0%; four studies; 169 participants) or antibiotics (18.3% vs 31.5%; RR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.33-0.98); I = 0%; three studies; 163 participants) as additional therapy to cerclage. The quality of evidence was downgraded two levels because of serious imprecision and indirectness, and therefore was judged as low.
In singleton gestations without prior spontaneous PTB but with TVS-CL < 25 mm in the second trimester, cerclage does not seem to prevent preterm delivery or improve neonatal outcome. However, in these pregnancies, cerclage seems to be efficacious at lower CLs, such as < 10 mm, and when tocolytics or antibiotics are used as additional therapy, requiring further studies in these subgroups. Given the low quality of evidence, further well-designed RCTs are needed to confirm the findings of this study. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是量化经阴道超声(TVS)检查发现无症状单胎妊娠中孕期宫颈长度(CL)<25mm 且无自发性早产史的患者行宫颈环扎术预防早产(PTB)的疗效。
从各数据库建立起至 2017 年 2 月,检索电子数据库,不设语言限制。所有无症状单胎妊娠、中孕期 TVS 检查发现 CL<25mm 且无自发性早产史的随机对照试验(RCT)均纳入研究。与所有纳入试验的通讯作者联系,以获取数据并进行个体患者水平数据的荟萃分析。调查员提供的数据合并到专门为该综述构建的主数据库中。主要结局为<35 周的早产。总结指标以 95%CI 表示的相对风险(RR)报告。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。
纳入了 5 项 RCT,包括 419 例 TVS-CL<25mm 且无自发性早产史的无症状单胎妊娠。与对照组相比,随机接受宫颈环扎术的孕妇中,<35 周早产(21.9%比 27.7%;RR,0.88(95%CI,0.63-1.23);I²=0%;5 项研究,419 例参与者)、<34 周、<32 周、<28 周和<24 周早产、分娩时的孕龄、早产胎膜早破(PPROM)和新生儿结局均无统计学差异。与未行宫颈环扎术的孕妇相比,接受宫颈环扎术的孕妇中,CL<10mm(39.5%比 58.0%;RR,0.68(95%CI,0.47-0.98);I²=0%;5 项研究,126 例参与者)和使用宫缩抑制剂(17.5%比 32.7%;RR,0.54(95%CI,0.31-0.93);I²=0%;4 项研究,169 例参与者)或抗生素(18.3%比 31.5%;RR,0.58(95%CI,0.33-0.98);I²=0%;3 项研究,163 例参与者)作为宫颈环扎术的辅助治疗时,<35 周早产的发生率较低。由于严重的不精确性和间接性,证据质量降低了两个等级,因此被判定为低质量。
在无自发性早产史但 TVS 中孕期 CL<25mm 的单胎妊娠中,宫颈环扎术似乎不能预防早产或改善新生儿结局。然而,在这些妊娠中,宫颈环扎术在 CL 较低时(如<10mm)似乎有效,且当使用宫缩抑制剂或抗生素作为辅助治疗时,需要在这些亚组中进一步研究。鉴于证据质量较低,需要进一步进行设计良好的 RCT 以确认本研究的结果。