a Department of Psychological, Pedagogical, and Educational Sciences , University of Palermo , Italy.
b Faculty of Psychology, University Nicolò Cusano , Rome , Italy.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Mar-Apr;100(2):207-218. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1282493. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) is a self-report measure that assesses self-criticism and dependency, 2 personality traits that confer vulnerability to depression (Blatt, 2004 ). Over several decades, different, shortened versions of the DEQ have been constructed to offer an alternative to the complex scoring procedure of the original DEQ. This study explores the factor structure as well as the construct and convergent validity of the DEQ by comparing a clinical and nonclinical sample. We also compared the original DEQ with 5 shortened versions. There were 621 participants (358 university students and 263 outpatients). Fit indexes for models of the original DEQ did not meet minimum fit criteria. Moreover, the only versions with satisfactory fit were the Theoretical Depressive Experiences Questionnaire-21 (TDEQ-21) and the Theoretical Depressive Experiences Questionnaire-12 (TDEQ-12), which also showed acceptable construct and convergent validity. Finally, the diagnostic and clinical applicability of the DEQ is discussed.
抑郁体验问卷(DEQ)是一种自我报告的测量工具,用于评估自我批评和依赖性这两种人格特质,这两种特质使个体易患抑郁症(Blatt,2004)。几十年来,已经构建了不同的、缩短版本的 DEQ,以提供一种替代原始 DEQ 复杂评分程序的方法。本研究通过比较临床和非临床样本,探讨了 DEQ 的因子结构以及构念和收敛效度。我们还将原始 DEQ 与 5 个缩短版本进行了比较。共有 621 名参与者(358 名大学生和 263 名门诊患者)。原始 DEQ 模型的拟合指标不符合最小拟合标准。此外,只有理论性抑郁体验问卷-21(TDEQ-21)和理论性抑郁体验问卷-12(TDEQ-12)这两个版本的拟合度令人满意,它们也显示出可接受的构念和收敛效度。最后,讨论了 DEQ 的诊断和临床适用性。