Santor D A, Zuroff D C, Fielding A
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
J Pers Assess. 1997 Aug;69(1):145-63. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6901_8.
Revisions of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ; Blatt, D'Afflitti, & Quinlan, 1976) have failed to replicate the degree of orthogonality routinely observed with the original Dependency and Self-Criticism scales. Item performance on the DEQ was examined by computing correlation coefficients between factor-derived scores and unit-weighted composite scores for Dependency and Self-Criticism as a function of (a) the importance of individual items in predicting factor-derived Dependency and Self-Criticism scores and (b) scale length. Analyses identified sets of unit-weighted items that optimally preserve the psychometric properties of the original DEQ scales, including between-scale orthogonality, while reducing the number of items used to measure Dependency and Self-Criticism. Findings were replicated in college (N = 172) and clinical (N = 83) samples. Limitations of exploratory principal components and confirmatory factor analysis as tools for revising scales are discussed.
对抑郁体验问卷(DEQ;布拉特、达菲利蒂和昆兰,1976年)的修订未能重现最初的依赖和自我批评量表中常规观察到的正交程度。通过计算因子衍生分数与依赖和自我批评的单位加权综合分数之间的相关系数,来考察DEQ上的项目表现,该相关系数是作为以下因素的函数:(a)各个项目在预测因子衍生的依赖和自我批评分数方面的重要性,以及(b)量表长度。分析确定了一组单位加权项目,这些项目在减少用于测量依赖和自我批评的项目数量的同时,能最佳地保留原始DEQ量表的心理测量特性,包括量表间的正交性。研究结果在大学样本(N = 172)和临床样本(N = 83)中得到了重复验证。本文还讨论了探索性主成分分析和验证性因素分析作为量表修订工具的局限性。