Chen Wen, Ling Li, Renzaho Andre M N
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Center for Migrant Health Policy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 15;7(3):e014313. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014313.
To assess the relationship between social integration and physical and mental health among humanitarian migrants (HMs) in Australia.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We used the recently released first wave of data from the 2013 'Building a New Life in Australia' survey, which is an ongoing nationwide longitudinal study. A total of 2399 HMs participated in the survey.
Self-rated physical health was measured using four items selected from the SF-36 which is a generic measure of health status. The 6-item Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6) was used to measure mental health. Social integration was measured using four dimensions: economic integration, acculturation, social capital and self-identity.
More than half (63%), 47% and 49% of participants self-rated well on the general health, physical function and role-physical dimensions, respectively and 46% reported not having any bodily pain. Seventeen per cent of participants had a serious mental illness. There was a positive relationship between social integration and physical and mental health. That is, factors associated with better health included less financial hardship (economic integration dimension), better English proficiency and self-sufficiency (acculturation dimension), having the capacity to communicate with locals, having friends from different ethnic/religious groups and attending a place of worship weekly or more often (social capital dimension) and feeling welcomed and having a strong sense of belonging in Australia (self-identity dimension).
Using a more comprehensive framework of social integration, we found that greater social integration was associated with better physical and mental health outcomes among HMs. Social integration should be embedded in HMs' resettlement programmes in order to reduce migration-related health inequities.
评估澳大利亚人道主义移民(HMs)的社会融合与身心健康之间的关系。
设计、背景和参与者:我们使用了最近发布的2013年“在澳大利亚开始新生活”调查的第一波数据,这是一项正在进行的全国性纵向研究。共有2399名人道主义移民参与了该调查。
使用从SF-36中选取的四个项目来测量自评身体健康,SF-36是一种通用的健康状况测量工具。使用6项凯斯勒心理困扰筛查量表(K6)来测量心理健康。社会融合通过四个维度进行测量:经济融合、文化适应、社会资本和自我认同。
超过一半(63%)、47%和49%的参与者在总体健康、身体功能和身体角色维度上自评良好,46%的参与者报告没有任何身体疼痛。17%的参与者患有严重精神疾病。社会融合与身心健康之间存在正相关关系。也就是说,与更好的健康相关的因素包括较少的经济困难(经济融合维度)、更好的英语水平和自给自足能力(文化适应维度)、有与当地人交流的能力、有来自不同种族/宗教群体的朋友以及每周或更频繁地参加宗教场所活动(社会资本维度),以及在澳大利亚感到受欢迎并有强烈的归属感(自我认同维度)。
通过使用更全面的社会融合框架,我们发现更大程度的社会融合与澳大利亚人道主义移民更好的身心健康结果相关。社会融合应纳入人道主义移民的重新安置计划,以减少与移民相关的健康不平等。