Yorzinski Jessica L, Patricelli Gail L, Bykau Siarhei, Platt Michael L
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
Duke Institute for Brain Sciences and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J Exp Biol. 2017 Mar 15;220(Pt 6):1146-1153. doi: 10.1242/jeb.150946.
Males in many species compete intensely for access to females. In order to minimize costly interactions, they can assess their rivals' competitive abilities by evaluating traits and behaviors. We know little about how males selectively direct their attention to make these assessments. Using Indian peafowl () as a model system, we examined how males visually assess their competitors by continuously tracking the gaze of freely moving peacocks during the mating season. When assessing rivals, peacocks selectively gazed toward the lower display regions of their rivals, including the lower eyespot and fishtail feathers, dense feathers, body and wings. Their attention was modified based on the rivals' behavior such that they spent more time looking at rivals when rivals were shaking their wings and moving. The results indicate that peacocks selectively allocate their attention during rival assessment. The gaze patterns of males assessing rivals were largely similar to those of females evaluating mates, suggesting that some male traits serve a dual function in both intra- and intersexual selection. However, males spent more time than females looking at the upper eyespots and this could indicate that the upper eyespots function more in close-up rival assessment than mate choice.
许多物种中的雄性为获得与雌性交配的机会而激烈竞争。为了尽量减少代价高昂的互动,它们可以通过评估特征和行为来评估竞争对手的竞争能力。我们对雄性如何有选择地引导注意力进行这些评估知之甚少。以印度孔雀()为模型系统,我们研究了在交配季节自由活动的雄孔雀通过持续跟踪其目光,如何在视觉上评估竞争对手。在评估对手时,雄孔雀会有选择地将目光投向对手较低的展示区域,包括较低的眼斑和鱼尾羽、密集的羽毛、身体和翅膀。它们的注意力会根据对手的行为而改变,比如当对手摇动翅膀并移动时,它们会花更多时间注视对手。结果表明,雄孔雀在评估对手时会有选择地分配注意力。评估对手的雄性的注视模式与评估配偶的雌性的注视模式在很大程度上相似,这表明一些雄性特征在同性和异性选择中都具有双重功能。然而,雄性比雌性花更多时间注视上部眼斑,这可能表明上部眼斑在近距离对手评估中比在配偶选择中发挥更大作用。