Suppr超能文献

针对抗血管生成药物治疗患者的动脉僵硬度的个体血压校正技术:队列研究评估。

Patient-specific blood pressure correction technique for arterial stiffness: evaluation in a cohort on anti-angiogenic medication.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2017 Aug;40(8):752-757. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.32. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

Arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV) depends on blood pressure (BP). Correction of PWV for BP is commonly performed using a statistical approach, requiring a patient cohort. We recently developed a mechanistic, model-predictive approach to assess BP-independent changes in carotid PWV (cPWV) at the level of the individual. The goal of the present study is to compare our novel technique to conventional statistical correction, in the context of anti-cancer therapy using anti-angiogenic drugs (AADs). AADs frequently lead to a PWV increase, but also to hypertension, underlining the need for BP correction of PWV measurements. We obtained carotid artery systolic and diastolic cross-sectional areas (echotracking) and corresponding BPs (tonometry) in 48 patients before starting AAD treatment (sorafenib/sunitinib), and at four follow-up visits spaced 2 weeks apart. For each patient, we derived cPWV and a baseline single-exponential BP cross-sectional area curve. Based on these baseline curves and follow-up BPs, we predicted cPWV at follow-up due to BP. By comparing predicted and measured cPWVs at follow-up, we assessed the BP-independent cPWV increase. In the same way, we assessed whether diastolic cross-sectional area (A) changed beyond the BP-induced amount. The AAD-induced BP-independent increase in cPWV was 0.43(0.09,0.77) m s (mean (95%CI), P=0.014, mechanistic approach) and 0.48(0.14,0.82) m s (P=0.006, statistical approach). A increased with 1.92(0.93,2.92) mm (P<0.001) and 2.14(1.06,3.23) mm (P<0.001), respectively. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of our mechanistic, model-predictive approach to quantify BP-independent effects on arterial stiffness at the level of the individual, in a clinically relevant setting of AAD therapy.

摘要

动脉脉搏波速度(PWV)取决于血压(BP)。通常使用统计方法校正 PWV 以适应 BP 的变化,这需要一个患者队列。我们最近开发了一种机械的、基于模型预测的方法来评估个体颈动脉 PWV(cPWV)的独立于 BP 的变化。本研究的目的是将我们的新技术与传统的统计校正方法进行比较,背景是使用抗血管生成药物(AAD)进行抗癌治疗。AAD 经常导致 PWV 增加,但也会导致高血压,这凸显了对 PWV 测量进行 BP 校正的必要性。我们在 48 名患者开始 AAD 治疗(索拉非尼/舒尼替尼)之前和相隔 2 周的 4 次随访中获得了颈动脉收缩期和舒张期横截面积(回声跟踪)和相应的 BP(张力测量)。对于每个患者,我们得出了 cPWV 和基线单指数 BP 横截面积曲线。基于这些基线曲线和随访 BP,我们预测了由于 BP 引起的随访时的 cPWV。通过比较随访时的预测和测量的 cPWV,我们评估了独立于 BP 的 cPWV 增加。同样,我们评估了舒张期横截面积(A)是否超出了 BP 诱导的量。AAD 引起的 cPWV 的独立于 BP 的增加为 0.43(0.09,0.77) m s(平均值(95%置信区间),P=0.014,机械方法)和 0.48(0.14,0.82) m s(P=0.006,统计方法)。A 增加了 1.92(0.93,2.92) mm(P<0.001)和 2.14(1.06,3.23) mm(P<0.001)。总之,本研究证明了我们的机械的、基于模型预测的方法在 AAD 治疗的临床相关背景下,在个体水平上定量评估动脉僵硬的独立于 BP 的影响的可行性和潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验