Mazza Alberto, Lenti Salvatore, Schiavon Laura, Sacco Antonella Paola, Dell'Avvocata Fabio, Rigatelli Gianluca, Ramazzina Emilio
Hypertension Centre Certified by the Italian Society of Hypertension, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, AULSS 5 Polesana, Rovigo, Italy.
Hypertension Centre and Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, San Donato Hospital, USL 8, Arezzo, Italy.
Adv Ther. 2017 Apr;34(4):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0511-1. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
Blood pressure (BP) control is the main clinical goal in the management of hypertensive patients; however, BP in most of these patients remains uncontrolled, despite the widespread availability of antihypertensive drugs as free-combination therapy. This study compared the efficacy of a fixed-dose triple combination (FDTC) of antihypertensive drugs with that of a free combination of three antihypertensives in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
Ninety-two patients (mean age 60.8 ± 12.1, 58.0% male) with uncontrolled essential hypertension (office systolic BP ≥ 140 or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg) previously treated with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor plus hydrochlorothiazide were switched to once-daily FDTC therapy with perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine (5-10/1.25-2.5/5-10 mg). Patients were age- and sex-matched with a control group of hypertensive patients receiving free-combination therapy with three drugs including a RAAS inhibitor, a diuretic, and a calcium channel blocker. Office BP and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) were evaluated at baseline and after 1 and 4 months.
Significant reductions in ambulatory 24-h, daytime, and nighttime systolic BP, and pulse pressure (PP) were found in the FDTC group relative to reductions seen with free-combination therapy, after the first month only of follow-up. Target BP values (mean 24-h ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP < 130/80 mmHg) were reached by more recipients of FDTC than free-combination therapy (64.8% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.05) at month 4 of follow-up, despite reductions in 24-h ABPM values from baseline being similar in both groups at this time point.
FDTC of perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine was effective at reducing SBP and PP in previously treated patients with uncontrolled hypertension, and well tolerated, providing support for clinicians in choosing a fixed-dose triple combination over the free-combination of a RAAS inhibitor, a diuretic, and a calcium antagonist.
血压控制是高血压患者管理中的主要临床目标;然而,尽管抗高血压药物作为自由联合疗法广泛可得,但这些患者中的大多数血压仍未得到控制。本研究比较了固定剂量三联组合(FDTC)抗高血压药物与三种抗高血压药物自由联合疗法在未控制高血压患者中的疗效。
92例(平均年龄60.8±12.1岁,58.0%为男性)未控制的原发性高血压患者(诊室收缩压≥140或舒张压≥90 mmHg),此前接受肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)抑制剂加氢氯噻嗪治疗,改为每日一次的培哚普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平(5-10/1.25-2.5/5-10 mg)固定剂量三联组合疗法。患者在年龄和性别上与接受包括RAAS抑制剂、利尿剂和钙通道阻滞剂三种药物自由联合疗法的高血压对照组相匹配。在基线以及1个月和4个月后评估诊室血压和24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)。
仅在随访的第一个月后,与自由联合疗法相比,固定剂量三联组合组的24小时动态收缩压、日间和夜间收缩压以及脉压(PP)均有显著降低。在随访第4个月时,接受固定剂量三联组合疗法的患者达到目标血压值(平均24小时动态收缩压/舒张压<130/80 mmHg)的比例高于自由联合疗法组(64.8%对46.9%,p<0.05),尽管此时两组24小时ABPM值相对于基线的降低相似。
培哚普利/吲达帕胺/氨氯地平固定剂量三联组合在降低先前治疗的未控制高血压患者的收缩压和脉压方面有效,且耐受性良好,为临床医生选择固定剂量三联组合而非RAAS抑制剂、利尿剂和钙拮抗剂的自由联合提供了支持。