Suppr超能文献

诱导化疗对晚期头颈癌生存的影响:一项国家癌症数据库分析。

Survival impact of induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis.

作者信息

Stokes William A, Amini Arya, Jones Bernard L, McDermott Jessica D, Raben David, Ghosh Debashis, Goddard Julie A, Bowles Daniel W, Karam Sana D

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2017 Jun;39(6):1113-1121. doi: 10.1002/hed.24739. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding induction chemotherapy to concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) has generally not improved the overall survival (OS) in randomized trials of patients with head and neck cancer. This failure may stem from inadequate power or inappropriate patient selection, prompting this National Cancer Data Base analysis.

METHODS

8031 patients with T4 or N2b to N3 disease undergoing RT and chemotherapy were divided into induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy cohorts. Multivariate analysis was used to explore the association of treatment with survival and to identify predictors of radiation dose.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis incorporating sociodemographic and clinical variables, survival of the induction chemotherapy cohort was not significantly different from that of the concurrent cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.05; p = .35), nor on subgroup analyses of advanced disease. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased odds of receiving <66 Gy among the patients in the induction chemotherapy cohort (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy subjects experienced no survival advantage over concurrent chemotherapy subjects but were more likely to receive lower RT doses. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1113-1121, 2017.

摘要

背景

在头颈部癌患者的随机试验中,在同步放化疗基础上加用诱导化疗一般并未改善总生存期(OS)。这种失败可能源于样本量不足或患者选择不当,因此开展了这项美国国立癌症数据库分析。

方法

8031例接受放疗和化疗的T4期或N2b至N3期疾病患者被分为诱导化疗组和同步化疗组。采用多因素分析探讨治疗与生存的关联,并确定放射剂量的预测因素。

结果

在纳入社会人口统计学和临床变量的多因素分析中,诱导化疗组的生存率与同步化疗组无显著差异(风险比[HR],0.96;95%置信区间[CI],0.88 - 1.05;p = 0.35),在晚期疾病亚组分析中也是如此。多因素分析表明,诱导化疗组患者接受<66 Gy放疗剂量的几率增加(p < 0.01)。

结论

诱导化疗患者与同步化疗患者相比没有生存优势,但更有可能接受较低的放疗剂量。©2017威利期刊公司。《头颈》39: 1113 - 1121, 2017。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验