Paudel Surya, Hess Michael, Hess Claudia
Clinic for Poultry and Fish Medicine, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Avian Dis. 2017 Mar;61(1):55-63. doi: 10.1637/11481-081016-Reg.
Avibacterium paragallinarum and Gallibacterium anatis are recognized bacterial pathogens both infecting the respiratory tract of chickens. The present study investigated outcomes of their coinfection by elucidating clinical signs, pathologic lesions, and bacteriologic findings. Additionally, the efficacy of a commercially available vaccine to prevent diseases caused by A. paragallinarum and G. anatis was evaluated. Birds inoculated with G. anatis alone did not present any clinical signs and gross pathologic lesions in the respiratory tract. However, clinical signs of infectious coryza were reproduced in nonvaccinated birds that were challenged with A. paragallinarum alone or together with G. anatis . Such clinical signs were more severe in the coinfected group, including the death of four birds. Some of the birds that were vaccinated and challenged showed mild clinical signs at 7 days postinfection (dpi). Inflammation of sinus infraorbitalis was the most prominent gross pathologic lesion found in the respiratory tract of nonvaccinated birds inoculated either with A. paragallinarum and G. anatis or A. paragallinarum alone. In the reproductive tract, hemorrhagic follicles were observed in nonvaccinated birds that were infected either with G. anatis alone or together with A. paragallinarum . In vaccinated birds, no gross pathologic lesions were found except in one bird that was coinfected with both the pathogens characterized by mucoid tracheitis. Bacteriologic investigations revealed that multiplication of G. anatis at 7 dpi was supported by the coinfection with A. paragallinarum . Altogether, it can be concluded that simultaneous infection of A. paragallinarum and G. anatis can increase the severities of disease conditions in chickens. In such a scenario, vaccination appears to be an effective tool for prevention of the disease, as protection was conferred based on clinical, pathologic, bacteriologic, and serologic data.
副鸡禽杆菌和鸭疫里默氏杆菌是公认的可感染鸡呼吸道的细菌性病原体。本研究通过阐明临床症状、病理病变和细菌学发现,对它们的混合感染结果进行了调查。此外,还评估了一种市售疫苗预防由副鸡禽杆菌和鸭疫里默氏杆菌引起疾病的效果。单独接种鸭疫里默氏杆菌的鸡未出现任何临床症状和呼吸道大体病理病变。然而,单独用副鸡禽杆菌或与鸭疫里默氏杆菌一起攻毒的未接种疫苗的鸡出现了传染性鼻炎的临床症状。在混合感染组中,这些临床症状更为严重,包括四只鸡死亡。一些接种疫苗并受到攻毒的鸡在感染后7天(dpi)出现了轻微的临床症状。眶下窦炎症是在接种副鸡禽杆菌和鸭疫里默氏杆菌或仅接种副鸡禽杆菌的未接种疫苗的鸡的呼吸道中发现的最突出的大体病理病变。在生殖道中,单独感染鸭疫里默氏杆菌或与副鸡禽杆菌一起感染的未接种疫苗的鸡中观察到出血性卵泡。在接种疫苗的鸡中,除了一只同时感染两种病原体并表现为黏液性气管炎的鸡外,未发现大体病理病变。细菌学调查显示,副鸡禽杆菌的混合感染促进了鸭疫里默氏杆菌在7 dpi时的增殖。总之,可以得出结论,副鸡禽杆菌和鸭疫里默氏杆菌的同时感染会增加鸡的疾病严重程度。在这种情况下,疫苗接种似乎是预防该病的有效工具,因为根据临床、病理、细菌学和血清学数据提供了保护。