Jacobs Bruce L, Yabes Jonathan G, Lopa Samia H, Heron Dwight E, Chang Chung-Chou H, Schroeck Florian R, Bekelman Justin E, Kahn Jeremy M, Nelson Joel B, Barnato Amber E
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cancer. 2017 Aug 1;123(15):2945-2954. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30574. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
Several new prostate cancer treatments have emerged since 2000, including 2 radiotherapies with similar efficacy at the time of their introduction: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The objectives of this study were to compare their early adoption patterns and identify factors associated with their use.
By using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, patients who received radiation therapy during the 5 years after IMRT introduction (2001-2005) and the 5 years after SBRT introduction (2007-2011) were identified. The outcome of interest was the receipt of new radiation therapy (ie, IMRT or SBRT) compared with the existing standard radiation therapies at that time. The authors fit a series of multivariable, hierarchical logistic regression models accounting for patients nested within health service areas to examine the factors associated with the receipt of new radiation therapy.
During 2001 to 2005, 5680 men (21%) received IMRT compared with standard radiation (n = 21,555). Men who received IMRT were older, had higher grade tumors, and lived in more populated areas (P < .05). During 2007 through 2011, 595 men (2%) received SBRT compared with standard radiation (n = 28,255). Men who received ng SBRT were more likely to be white, had lower grade tumors, lived in more populated areas, and were more likely to live in the Northeast (P < .05). Adjusting for cohort demographic and clinical factors, the early adoption rate for IMRT was substantially higher than that for SBRT (44% vs 4%; P < .01).
There is a stark contrast in the adoption rates of IMRT and SBRT at the time of their introduction. Further investigation of the nonclinical factors associated with this difference is warranted. Cancer 2017;123:2945-54. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
自2000年以来出现了几种新的前列腺癌治疗方法,包括2种在引入时疗效相似的放射疗法:调强放射治疗(IMRT)和立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)。本研究的目的是比较它们的早期采用模式,并确定与它们使用相关的因素。
通过使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库,确定了在IMRT引入后的5年(2001 - 2005年)和SBRT引入后的5年(2007 - 2011年)接受放射治疗的患者。感兴趣的结果是与当时现有的标准放射疗法相比,接受新的放射治疗(即IMRT或SBRT)的情况。作者建立了一系列多变量分层逻辑回归模型,考虑了嵌套在卫生服务区域内的患者,以检查与接受新放射治疗相关的因素。
在2001年至2005年期间,与接受标准放射治疗的患者(n = 21,555)相比,有5680名男性(21%)接受了IMRT。接受IMRT的男性年龄更大,肿瘤分级更高,且居住在人口更密集的地区(P <.05)。在2007年至2011年期间,与接受标准放射治疗的患者(n = 28,255)相比,有595名男性(2%)接受了SBRT。接受SBRT的男性更可能是白人,肿瘤分级较低,居住在人口更密集的地区,且更可能居住在东北部(P <.05)。在调整了队列人口统计学和临床因素后,IMRT的早期采用率显著高于SBRT(44%对4%;P <.01)。
IMRT和SBRT在引入时的采用率存在鲜明对比。有必要进一步调查与这种差异相关的非临床因素。《癌症》2017年;123:2945 - 54。© 2017美国癌症协会。