• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食草动物对周丛生物去除率的实证分析。

Empirical analysis of the removal rate of periphyton by grazers.

作者信息

Cattaneo Antonella, Mousseau Brigitte

机构信息

Département de Sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal, succursale Centre Ville, C.P. 6128, H3C 3J7, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1995 Aug;103(2):249-254. doi: 10.1007/BF00329087.

DOI:10.1007/BF00329087
PMID:28306780
Abstract

To establish a general model for the removal rate of periphyton by grazers, we identified 27 publications in which removal rates could be estimated from grazer enclosure or exclosure experiments. When all the measurements obtained under different experimental conditions were extracted, these publications provided 107 data points. Multiple regression of these data showed that periphyton removal rate increased significantly with grazer body mass and food availability, and decreased with grazer crowding. Grazer body mass explained 65% of the variation, while crowding and food availability explained 7 and 6% respectively. Except for the significantly lower removal rate of amphibians, neither taxon of the grazer nor algal composition significantly affected removal rate. Experiments in the laboratory and in outdoor channels tended to give higher removal rates than experiments performed in streams or lakes. A comparison with previous allometric equations predicting the ingestion rate of other invertebrate guilds, and with experiments in which periphyton ingestion rate was measured as incorporation of labelled food, indicated that a large portion of periphyton is removed by the activity of the grazer rather than by direct ingestion. These results could be utilized to predict the impact of grazing on periphyton biomass.

摘要

为建立一个食草动物对周丛生物去除率的通用模型,我们筛选出27篇可从食草动物围隔或排除实验中估算去除率的文献。提取不同实验条件下获得的所有测量数据后,这些文献提供了107个数据点。对这些数据进行多元回归分析表明,周丛生物去除率随食草动物体重和食物可利用性显著增加,随食草动物拥挤程度降低。食草动物体重解释了65%的变异,而拥挤程度和食物可利用性分别解释了7%和6%。除两栖动物的去除率显著较低外,食草动物类群和藻类组成均未显著影响去除率。实验室和室外渠道的实验往往比溪流或湖泊中的实验具有更高的去除率。与先前预测其他无脊椎动物类群摄食率的异速生长方程以及通过标记食物掺入量测量周丛生物摄食率的实验进行比较表明,大部分周丛生物是通过食草动物的活动而非直接摄食去除的。这些结果可用于预测放牧对周丛生物量的影响。

相似文献

1
Empirical analysis of the removal rate of periphyton by grazers.食草动物对周丛生物去除率的实证分析。
Oecologia. 1995 Aug;103(2):249-254. doi: 10.1007/BF00329087.
2
META-ANALYSIS OF GRAZER CONTROL OF PERIPHYTON BIOMASS ACROSS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS(1).跨水生生态系统的食草动物对周丛生物量控制的荟萃分析(1)。
J Phycol. 2009 Aug;45(4):798-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00702.x.
3
How do grazers affect periphyton heterogeneity in streams?食草动物如何影响溪流中的周丛生物异质性?
Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):576-87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1759-0. Epub 2004 Nov 16.
4
The effect of grazer size manipulation on periphyton communities.食草动物大小操控对附生植物群落的影响。
Oecologia. 1986 Jul;69(4):612-617. doi: 10.1007/BF00410371.
5
Benthic grazing in a eutrophic river: cascading effects of zoobenthivorous fish mask direct effects of herbivorous fish.富营养化河流中的底栖生物摄食:食底栖动物鱼类的级联效应掩盖了食草鱼类的直接影响。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 14;6:e4381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4381. eCollection 2018.
6
Redundancy among three herbivorous insects across an experimental current velocity gradient.在实验性水流速度梯度下三种食草昆虫之间的冗余现象。
Oecologia. 2003 Jan;134(2):262-9. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1086-2. Epub 2002 Nov 20.
7
Ecological stoichiometry of indirect grazer effects on periphyton nutrient content.间接食草动物对附生植物养分含量影响的生态化学计量学
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):619-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0930-9. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
8
Herbivorous caddisflies, macroalgae, and epilithic microalgae: dynamic interactions in a stream grazing system.植食性毛翅目昆虫、大型藻类和附石微藻:溪流牧食系统中的动态相互作用
Oecologia. 1991 Jul;87(2):247-256. doi: 10.1007/BF00325263.
9
Effects of omnivorous shrimp in a montane tropical stream: sediment removal, disturbance of sessile invertebrates and enhancement of understory algal biomass.杂食性虾类对山地热带溪流的影响:沉积物清除、对固着无脊椎动物的干扰以及林下藻类生物量的增加。
Oecologia. 1993 Feb;93(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00321183.
10
Grazer control of nutrient availability in the periphyton.浮游生物中食草动物对养分可利用性的控制
Oecologia. 1991 Apr;86(2):287-291. doi: 10.1007/BF00317542.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoupling of cascading trophic interactions in a freshwater, benthic food chain.淡水底栖食物链中级联营养相互作用的解耦
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):534-541. doi: 10.1007/BF00333731.
2
Habitat architecture and trophic interaction strength in a river: riffle-scale effects.河流中的栖息地结构与营养级相互作用强度:浅滩尺度效应
Oecologia. 1996 Aug;107(3):411-420. doi: 10.1007/BF00328458.
3
Uncoupling of omnivore-mediated positive and negative effects on periphyton mats.杂食动物对附生植物垫的正负效应解耦。

本文引用的文献

1
A new radiotracer technique involving C and Cr, for estimating the assimilation efficiencies of aquatic, primary consumers.一种涉及碳(C)和铬(Cr)的新型放射性示踪技术,用于估算水生初级消费者的同化效率。
Oecologia. 1972 Jun;9(2):155-170. doi: 10.1007/BF00345880.
2
Responses of stream algae to grazing minnows and nutrients: a field test for interactions.溪流藻类对食草米诺鱼和养分的响应:相互作用的田间试验
Oecologia. 1987 Apr;72(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00385036.
3
Herbivory and intraspecific competition in a stream caddisfly population.溪流毛翅目昆虫种群中的食草行为与种内竞争
Oecologia. 2003 Aug;136(4):585-95. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1294-4. Epub 2003 May 27.
Oecologia. 1987 Aug;73(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/BF00376980.
4
Experimental studies of exploitative competition in a grazing stream insect.对一种牧食性溪流昆虫中剥削性竞争的实验研究。
Oecologia. 1987 Aug;73(1):41-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00376975.
5
Ingestion rate: An empirical model for aquatic deposit feeders and detritivores.摄食率:水生沉积物摄食者和碎屑食性动物的经验模型。
Oecologia. 1979 Jan;44(3):303-310. doi: 10.1007/BF00545232.