Stadler Bernhard
Bayreuth Institute for Tenestrial Ecosystem Research, University of Bayreuth, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany.
Oecologia. 1995 May;102(2):246-254. doi: 10.1007/BF00333257.
The need to allocate a limited amount of energy between different life-history traits is a fundamental assumption in life-history theory. However, it has often turned out to be extremely difficult to measure the competing processes that contribute to costs or benefits for individual organisms. The present investigation begins by analysing how an aphid clonal lineage adapts its reproductive investment to moderate changes in host plant quality (e.g. during the life cycle of its host). Using Centaurea jacea and Uroleucon jaceae as a model plantaphid system, I show that reproductive investment can be far more complex than indicated by dry or wet mass of the gonads alone. The number of embryos of a particular size class or developmental state present in the reproductive system of an aphid is highly flexible and is influenced by the quality of the host plant. Next, the effects of a particular reproductive investment on survival during periods of food deprivation are analysed for aphids originating from host-plants of different qualities. When food stress is severe the ability to rapidly resorb and reallocate resources committed to offspring is important for survival. However, this ability is limited. I argue that, in periods of food stress, young, unsclerotized embryos might serve as a kind of energy buffer similar to a fat body and are therefore not relevant to cost-benefit calculations. However, embryos that are beginning to sclerotize within the ovarioles are not available for resorption and resource reallocation. They compete for nutrients with their mother and contribute to costs. Therefore, it is suggested that the reproductive investment of an aphid should not be equated with reproductive costs in a general al way. The dynamics of adaptive resource allocation and resorption are a key feature of an aphid's life history, and the implications for life-history theory are discussed.
在不同生活史特征之间分配有限能量的必要性是生活史理论的一个基本假设。然而,事实证明,要衡量那些对个体生物的成本或收益有贡献的相互竞争的过程极其困难。本研究首先分析了蚜虫克隆谱系如何调整其生殖投资,以适应宿主植物质量的适度变化(例如在其宿主的生命周期中)。以矢车菊和矢车菊长管蚜作为植物 - 蚜虫模型系统,我发现生殖投资可能比仅由性腺的干质量或湿质量所表明的要复杂得多。蚜虫生殖系统中特定大小类别或发育状态的胚胎数量具有高度灵活性,并受宿主植物质量的影响。接下来,分析了来自不同质量宿主植物的蚜虫在食物匮乏时期特定生殖投资对生存的影响。当食物压力严重时,迅速吸收和重新分配用于后代的资源的能力对生存很重要。然而,这种能力是有限的。我认为,在食物压力时期,幼小的、未硬化的胚胎可能充当类似于脂肪体的一种能量缓冲,因此与成本效益计算无关。然而,在卵巢管内开始硬化的胚胎不可用于吸收和资源重新分配。它们与母亲争夺营养,并构成成本。因此,有人建议,蚜虫的生殖投资不应一概而论地等同于生殖成本。适应性资源分配和吸收的动态是蚜虫生活史的一个关键特征,并讨论了其对生活史理论的影响。