• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

草甸田鼠在活动范围、斑块和景观尺度上对空间和栖息地的利用。

Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales.

作者信息

Bowers Michael A, Gregario Kristina, Brame Courtney J, Matter Stephen F, Dooley James L

机构信息

Department of Environmental Sciences and Blandy Experimental Farm, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 175, 22620, Boyce, VA, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1996 Jan;105(1):107-115. doi: 10.1007/BF00328798.

DOI:10.1007/BF00328798
PMID:28307129
Abstract

Using capture/recapture methods, we examined the spatial usage patterns of Microtus pennsylvanicus within and between experimentally created habitat patches of three sizes (1.0, 0.25 and 0.0625 ha) and between a 20-ha fragmented and a 20-ha continuous habitat landscape. We tested the prediction that home ranges near patch edges would be qualitatively different from those in patch interiors, and that the edge:interior habitat ratio could be used to make predictions concerning the dispersion and spatial use of individuals occupying different sized patches and between landscapes with different habitat structure. We found adult females on patch edges to have larger and more exclusive home ranges, larger body sizes, longer residence times, and to reproduce at a higher frequency than those in patch interiors. These "edge effects" also appeared to be largely responsible for the greater proportion of larger, reproductive females we found in small than larger patches and in the fragmented than in the continuous habitat (control) landscape. The selection of higher quality edge habitats by dominant females and the relegation of sub-dominants to patch interiors provides an explanation for the observed differences in the distribution and performance of females over patches and between landscapes.

摘要

我们运用捕获-再捕获方法,研究了宾夕法尼亚田鼠在三种不同大小(1.0公顷、0.25公顷和0.0625公顷)的实验性创建栖息地斑块内部及之间,以及在一个20公顷的破碎化栖息地景观和一个20公顷的连续栖息地景观之间的空间利用模式。我们检验了以下预测:斑块边缘附近的家域在性质上会与斑块内部的家域不同,并且边缘与内部栖息地的比例可用于预测占据不同大小斑块以及不同栖息地结构景观中个体的扩散和空间利用情况。我们发现,斑块边缘的成年雌性田鼠比斑块内部的成年雌性田鼠具有更大且更具排他性的家域、更大的体型、更长的停留时间,并且繁殖频率更高。这些“边缘效应”似乎也在很大程度上解释了我们在小斑块中比大斑块中、在破碎化栖息地景观中比连续栖息地(对照)景观中发现的较大繁殖雌性田鼠比例更高的现象。优势雌性对更高质量边缘栖息地的选择以及次优势雌性被排挤到斑块内部,为观察到的雌性在斑块间和景观间分布及表现的差异提供了解释。

相似文献

1
Use of space and habitats by meadow voles at the home range, patch and landscape scales.草甸田鼠在活动范围、斑块和景观尺度上对空间和栖息地的利用。
Oecologia. 1996 Jan;105(1):107-115. doi: 10.1007/BF00328798.
2
The effects of experimental habitat destruction and patch isolation on space use and fitness parameters in female root vole Microtus oeconomus.实验性栖息地破坏和斑块隔离对雌性根田鼠(Microtus oeconomus)空间利用和适合度参数的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 1998 Nov;67(6):941-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.6760941.x.
3
Edge effects and geometric constraints: a landscape-level empirical test.边缘效应与几何约束:一项景观尺度的实证检验
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):97-105. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12430. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Comparing edge and fragmentation effects within seagrass communities: A meta-analysis.比较海草群落内的边缘和碎裂效应:一项荟萃分析。
Ecology. 2022 Mar;103(3):e3603. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3603. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
5
Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals.栖息地破碎化的对照实验:一个简单的计算机模拟和一项使用小型哺乳动物的测试
Oecologia. 1996 Oct;108(1):182-191. doi: 10.1007/BF00333230.
6
Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects.小型哺乳动物的捕食风险与种子移除:微生境与斑块尺度效应
Oecologia. 1993 May;94(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/BF00341324.
7
Shape of patch edges affects edge permeability for meadow voles.贴片边缘形状影响草原田鼠的边缘渗透性。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Sep;22(6):1827-37. doi: 10.1890/11-1034.1.
8
Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection.移动是连接家园范围和栖息地选择的纽带。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jan;85(1):21-31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12394. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
9
Resource distribution influences positive edge effects in a seagrass fish.资源分布影响海草鱼类的正边缘效应。
Ecology. 2010 Jul;91(7):2013-21. doi: 10.1890/08-1890.1.
10
Foraging behaviour of the root vole Microtus oeconomus in fragmented habitats.根田鼠(Microtus oeconomus)在破碎化栖息地中的觅食行为。
Oecologia. 1999 Nov;121(2):236-244. doi: 10.1007/s004420050925.

引用本文的文献

1
Do positions in individual-based ectoparasite-small mammal networks differ between female and male hosts?基于个体的体外寄生虫 - 小型哺乳动物网络中的位置在雌性和雄性宿主之间是否存在差异?
Parasitol Res. 2025 Apr 29;124(4):45. doi: 10.1007/s00436-025-08492-2.
2
Female Chemical Signalling Underlying Reproduction in Mammals.哺乳动物繁殖过程中潜在的雌性化学信号传导。
J Chem Ecol. 2018 Sep;44(9):851-873. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-0981-x. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Controlled experiments of habitat fragmentation: a simple computer simulation and a test using small mammals.

本文引用的文献

1
Predation hazard and seed removal by small mammals: microhabitat versus patch scale effects.小型哺乳动物的捕食风险与种子移除:微生境与斑块尺度效应
Oecologia. 1993 May;94(2):247-254. doi: 10.1007/BF00341324.
2
Microhabitat heterogeneity and population ecology of an herbivorous rodent, Microtus californicus.草食性啮齿动物加州田鼠的微生境异质性与种群生态学
Oecologia. 1983 Sep;59(2-3):167-177. doi: 10.1007/BF00378834.
3
Diverse and contrasting effects of habitat fragmentation.生境破碎化的多样且相反的影响。
栖息地破碎化的对照实验:一个简单的计算机模拟和一项使用小型哺乳动物的测试
Oecologia. 1996 Oct;108(1):182-191. doi: 10.1007/BF00333230.
4
Responses of five small mammal species to micro-scale variations in vegetation structure in secondary Atlantic Forest remnants, Brazil.巴西大西洋森林次生残留地中五种小型哺乳动物物种对植被结构微观尺度变化的反应。
BMC Ecol. 2008 May 5;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-8-9.
Science. 1992 Jul 24;257(5069):524-6. doi: 10.1126/science.257.5069.524.
4
Measurement of non-circular home range.非圆形活动范围的测量。
J Theor Biol. 1969 Feb;22(2):227-37. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(69)90002-2.
5
The territorial defense hypothesis and the ecology of insular vertebrates.领地防御假说与岛屿脊椎动物生态学
Q Rev Biol. 1985 Jun;60(2):155-81. doi: 10.1086/414314.