Gaugler R, Lewis Edwin, Stuart Robin J
Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0321, USA, , , , , , US.
Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA, , , , , , US.
Oecologia. 1997 Feb;109(4):483-489. doi: 10.1007/s004420050108.
Biological control manipulations of natural enemies to reduce pest populations represent large-scale ecological experiments that have both benefited from and contributed to various areas of modern ecology. Unfortunately, economic expediency and the need for rapid implementation often require that biological control programs be based more on trial and error than on sound ecological theory and testing. This approach has led to some remarkable successes but it has also produced dismal failures. This point is particularly well illustrated in the historical development and use of entomopathogenic nematodes for the biological control of insect pests. Intense effort has focused on developing these natural enemies as alternatives to chemical insecticides, in part because laboratory assays indicated that these nematodes possess a broad host range. This illusory attribute launched hundreds of field releases, many of which failed due to ecological barriers to infection that are not apparent from laboratory exposures, where conditions are optimal and host-parasite contact assured. For example, the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae is a poor choice to control scarab larvae because this nematode uses an ambusher foraging strategy near the soil surface whereas the equally sedentary scarab remains within the soil profile, shows a weak host recognition response to scarabs, has difficulty overcoming the scarab immune response, and has low reproduction in this host. Conversely, two other nematodes, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and S. glaseri, are highly adapted to parasitize scarabs: they use a cruising foraging strategy, respond strongly to scarabs, easily overcome the immune response, and reproduce well in these hosts. Increased understanding of the ecology of entomopathogenic nematodes has enabled better matches between parasites and hosts, and more accurate predictions of field performance. These results underline the importance of a strong partnership between basic and applied ecology in the area of biological control.
利用天敌进行生物防治以减少害虫数量,这是大规模的生态实验,既受益于现代生态学的各个领域,也为其做出了贡献。不幸的是,经济上的权宜之计和快速实施的需求往往要求生物防治计划更多地基于反复试验,而非可靠的生态理论和测试。这种方法带来了一些显著的成功,但也产生了惨痛的失败。昆虫病原线虫在害虫生物防治中的历史发展和应用就很好地说明了这一点。人们投入了大量精力将这些天敌开发为化学杀虫剂的替代品,部分原因是实验室检测表明这些线虫具有广泛的宿主范围。这种虚幻的特性导致了数百次田间释放,其中许多由于感染的生态障碍而失败,而这些障碍在实验室环境中并不明显,因为实验室条件是最佳的,宿主与寄生虫的接触也能得到保证。例如,昆虫病原线虫小卷蛾斯氏线虫不是控制金龟子幼虫的理想选择,因为这种线虫在土壤表面附近采用伏击式觅食策略,而同样行动迟缓的金龟子则留在土壤剖面内,对金龟子的宿主识别反应较弱,难以克服金龟子的免疫反应,并且在这种宿主中的繁殖率较低。相反,另外两种线虫,嗜菌异小杆线虫和格氏斯氏线虫,高度适应寄生于金龟子:它们采用巡游式觅食策略,对金龟子反应强烈,容易克服免疫反应,并且在这些宿主中繁殖良好。对昆虫病原线虫生态学的深入了解使得寄生虫与宿主之间的匹配更好,对田间表现也有了更准确的预测。这些结果强调了基础生态学与应用生态学在生物防治领域建立紧密合作关系的重要性。