Boeken Bertrand, Lipchin Clive, Gutterman Yitzchak, van Rooyen Noel
Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research and Dept. of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boker Campus 84990, Israel, , , , , , IL.
Department of Botany, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa, , , , , , ZA.
Oecologia. 1998 Mar;114(1):106-117. doi: 10.1007/s004420050426.
We investigated whether plant diversity and productivity in small-scale soil disturbances, which is known to be higher than in undisturbed soil, decreases as the density of the disturbances increases. We studied this in an experiment with soil diggings (15 cm diameter and 15 cm depth) dug at a range of densities, on a north- and a south-facing slope of a watershed in the central Negev Desert of Israel. The diggings were similar to the commonly occurring pits made by porcupines (Hystrix indica) as they forage for below-ground plant parts. We used four levels of digging density, within the naturally occurring range in the region, represented by a rectangular plot with rows of diggings dug at four distances between diggings. The plots were laid out in a blocked design with three replications on both slopes, with each block containing all four levels of digging density. In the spring of 1992, 1994 and 1995 we measured plant density, species richness and plant productivity in the diggings, and in adjacent equal-sized undisturbed control areas ("soil matrix") and on the mounds made by the removed excess soil. Plant density, species richness and productivity of annual plants were higher in the diggings than in the undisturbed matrix, while these responses were very low on the mounds. Plant density, species richness and productivity in the diggings, but not in the matrix or mounds, decreased as digging density increased. This effect varied slightly with location within a watershed and with annual rainfall. The density of seeds captured in the diggings from outside the digging during the 1995 dispersal season decreased with increasing digging density, but only on one of the slopes. At the highest digging density, plant density and species number in the diggings did not decrease down the slope, as expected if interference between diggings in runoff water capture were the cause of the digging density effect. There was a weak decrease in biomass production in 1994-1995 down the slope. We used a simple mathematical model to estimate whether the distribution of rainfall intensities that occurred during the winter of 1994-1995 could result in differences between digging densities in the amount of water captured by the diggings, and whether this could explain the observed effect of digging density. The model showed that there were four events during which less water was captured by the diggings at high digging densities, except in the topmost row of diggings. Soil moisture measurements, however, showed very little difference between diggings at different digging densities. We explain our findings as the result of the interaction between the properties of the disturbance patch with its surroundings, as the diggings capture resources in the form of runoff water, and seeds moved primarily by wind. The additional resources and seeds captured in diggings increase plant density, species richness and productivity relative to the undisturbed matrix. However, the contrast in plant responses between the disturbed patches and undisturbed soil diminishes at higher digging densities. We explain this as interference among diggings at close proximity. As we did not detect a decrease in plant responses down the slopes, we conclude that interference is due to interception of the wind-driven, non-directional flow of seeds. Interception of the down-slope flow of runoff water by upslope diggings is insufficient to affect plant density, determined at the beginning of the season. Later in the season, runoff interception may become important for biomass production.
我们研究了小规模土壤扰动区域(已知其植物多样性和生产力高于未扰动土壤)的植物多样性和生产力是否会随着扰动密度的增加而降低。我们在以色列内盖夫沙漠中部一个流域的北向和南向山坡上进行了一项实验,挖掘了一系列密度的土壤坑(直径15厘米,深15厘米)。这些挖掘的坑类似于豪猪(印度豪猪)觅食地下植物部分时常见的坑。我们使用了四个挖掘密度水平,在该地区自然发生的范围内,以一个矩形地块表示,地块中有成排的挖掘坑,挖掘坑之间有四个不同的间距。这些地块采用区组设计,在两个山坡上各有三个重复,每个区组包含所有四个挖掘密度水平。在1992年、1994年和1995年的春季,我们测量了挖掘坑内、相邻等面积未扰动对照区域(“土壤基质”)以及由挖出的多余土壤形成的土堆上的植物密度、物种丰富度和植物生产力。挖掘坑内一年生植物的植物密度、物种丰富度和生产力高于未扰动的基质,而这些响应在土堆上非常低。挖掘坑内的植物密度、物种丰富度和生产力随着挖掘密度的增加而降低,但在基质或土堆中并非如此。这种影响在流域内的位置和年降雨量方面略有变化。在1995年种子传播季节,从挖掘坑外部捕获到挖掘坑内的种子密度随着挖掘密度的增加而降低,但仅在其中一个山坡上是这样。在最高挖掘密度下,挖掘坑内的植物密度和物种数量并没有像预期的那样沿着山坡降低,如果挖掘坑在径流捕获方面的干扰是挖掘密度效应的原因的话。在1994 - 1995年,沿着山坡生物量生产有微弱的下降。我们使用一个简单的数学模型来估计1994 - 1995年冬季出现的降雨强度分布是否会导致不同挖掘密度的挖掘坑在捕获水量上存在差异,以及这是否可以解释观察到的挖掘密度效应。该模型表明有四个事件,在这些事件中,除了最上面一排挖掘坑外,高挖掘密度的挖掘坑捕获的水量较少。然而,土壤湿度测量显示不同挖掘密度的挖掘坑之间差异很小。我们将我们的发现解释为扰动斑块与其周围环境相互作用的结果,因为挖掘坑以径流的形式捕获资源,并且种子主要通过风移动。相对于未扰动的基质,挖掘坑中捕获的额外资源和种子增加了植物密度、物种丰富度和生产力。然而,在较高挖掘密度下,受扰动斑块和未扰动土壤之间植物响应的差异减小。我们将此解释为相邻挖掘坑之间的干扰。由于我们没有检测到沿着山坡植物响应的降低,我们得出结论,干扰是由于对风驱动的、非定向种子流的拦截。上坡挖掘坑对下坡径流的拦截不足以影响在季节开始时确定的植物密度。在季节后期,径流拦截可能对生物量生产变得重要。