Valentine John F, Heck Kenneth L, Busby Jill, Webb David
Marine Environmental Sciences Consortium, P.O. Box 369 Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL 36528-0369 and Department of Marine Science, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688-0002, USA Fax: 334/861-7540; e-mail:
Department of Biology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406-5018, USA, , , , , , US.
Oecologia. 1997 Oct;112(2):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s004420050300.
The sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus, has been estimated to consume between 50 and 90% of annual net aboveground production in selected turtlegrass (Thalassia testudinum) meadows in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Nevertheless, turtlegrass persists where sea urchin grazing is intense. We hypothesized that turtlegrass productivity is stimulated by grazing, as has been reported from terrestrial grassland systems, and that this best explains the persistence of heavily grazed turtlegrass in St. Joseph Bay, Fla. This hypothesis was tested by manipulating sea urchin densities (0, 10, and 20 individuals/m) in 1-m enclosures. These densities encompass the range of average densities at the study site and those reported in the literature. Changes in turtlegrass abundance (e.g., short shoot density and biomass), production by short shoots, and leaf width were monitored in these enclosures during the summer. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that production by short shoots, leaf density/shoot, and leaf width decreased over time in all treatments. Leaf density/shoot and leaf width were not significantly impacted by grazing, nor did grazing significantly reduce seagrass biomass, but it did lead to significantly higher densities of short shoots than found in control cages. Our results indicate that turtlegrass compensates for the effects of sea urchin herbivory by increasing the recruitment of short shoots during the growing season. We estimate that this increased shoot density led to a 40% increase in net aboveground primary production (g dry weight/m) in grazing treatments, which helps to explain the lack of significant reductions of sea grass biomass during the growing season.
据估计,在墨西哥湾东部特定的龟草(泰来草)草甸中,多斑刺冠海胆消耗了每年地上净产量的50%至90%。然而,在海胆密集啃食的地方,龟草依然存在。我们推测,如同陆地草原系统中所报道的那样,龟草的生产力会受到啃食的刺激,而这最能解释佛罗里达州圣约瑟夫湾中重度啃食的龟草为何能够持续存在。通过在1米见方的围栏中控制海胆密度(0、10和20只/平方米)对这一假设进行了检验。这些密度涵盖了研究地点的平均密度范围以及文献中报道的密度范围。在夏季,对这些围栏中的龟草丰度变化(例如短枝密度和生物量)、短枝的产量以及叶片宽度进行了监测。重复测量方差分析表明,在所有处理中,短枝的产量、叶密度/枝以及叶片宽度均随时间下降。叶密度/枝和叶片宽度并未受到啃食的显著影响,啃食也未显著降低海草生物量,但确实导致短枝密度显著高于对照笼子中的密度。我们的结果表明,龟草通过在生长季节增加短枝的补充来补偿海胆食草作用的影响。我们估计,这种增加的枝密度使得啃食处理中的地上净初级生产力(克干重/平方米)提高了40%,这有助于解释生长季节中海草生物量为何没有显著减少。