Restrepo Carla, Vargas Arlex
Department of Zoology, University of Florida, 223 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, , , , , , US.
Carrera 50B 74-46, Medellín, Colombia, , , , , , CO.
Oecologia. 1999 May;119(3):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s004420050803.
Edges resulting from forest clear-cutting and treefall gaps can affect plant populations and consequently the distribution of species across landscapes. These two types of disturbance might interact to exacerbate or ameliorate "edge effects", a rarely tested possibility. We focused on the effects of distance from forest edge (0-10, 30-40, 60-70, and 190-200 m) and habitat within forest fragments (treefall gaps and intact forest) on the early stages of development of Palicourea gibbosa and Faramea affinis, two common shrubs of montane forests in southwest Colombia. Seed germination and seedling growth did not change with distance from forest edge. Within forest fragments, however, seed germination and seedling growth were higher in treefall gaps than in intact forest understory for both species. In contrast, seed predation was influenced by distance from forest edge and in P gibbosa it depended on habitat. Seed predation was highest in the forest interior (190-200 m from forest edge) and in P. gibbosa this was true only in treefall gap habitats. These results suggest that animal mediated processes such as post-dispersal seed predation are more likely than physiological processes to be affected by anthropogenic edges. Our results provide some evidence that treefall gaps may interact with "edge effects", however, they are inconclusive as to whether they exacerbate or ameliorate them.
森林砍伐和树木倒伏形成的林缘会影响植物种群,进而影响物种在景观中的分布。这两种干扰类型可能相互作用,加剧或减轻“边缘效应”,但这种可能性很少得到验证。我们重点研究了距森林边缘的距离(0 - 10米、30 - 40米、60 - 70米和190 - 200米)以及森林片段内的栖息地(树木倒伏间隙和完整森林)对哥伦比亚西南部山地森林中两种常见灌木——吉氏帕利草(Palicourea gibbosa)和近法拉草(Faramea affinis)发育早期阶段的影响。种子萌发和幼苗生长并未随距森林边缘的距离而变化。然而,在森林片段内,对于这两个物种而言,树木倒伏间隙中的种子萌发和幼苗生长均高于完整森林林下。相反,种子捕食受到距森林边缘距离的影响,对于吉氏帕利草来说,还取决于栖息地。森林内部(距森林边缘190 - 200米)的种子捕食率最高,对于吉氏帕利草而言,仅在树木倒伏间隙栖息地是如此。这些结果表明,诸如扩散后种子捕食等动物介导的过程比生理过程更有可能受到人为边缘的影响。我们的结果提供了一些证据,表明树木倒伏间隙可能与“边缘效应”相互作用,然而,关于它们是加剧还是减轻边缘效应,结果尚无定论。