Cook Rosamonde R, Quinn James F
Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA, , , , , , US.
Oecologia. 1998 Feb;113(4):584-592. doi: 10.1007/s004420050412.
Randomization models, often termed "null" models, have been widely used since the 1970s in studies of species community and biogeographic patterns. More recently they have been used to test for nested species subset patterns (or nestedness) among assemblages of species occupying spatially subdivided habitats, such as island archipelagoes and terrestrial habitat patches. Nestedness occurs when the species occupying small or species-poor sites have a strong tendency to form proper subsets of richer species assemblages. In this paper, we examine the ability of several published simulation models to detect, in an unbiased way, nested subset patterns from a simple matrix of site-by-species presence-absence data. Each approach attempts to build in biological realism by following the assumption that the ecological processes that generated the patterns observed in nature would, if they could be repeated many times over using the same species and landscape configuration, produce islands with the same number of species and species present on the same number of islands as observed. In mathematical terms, the mean marginal totals (column and row sums) of many simulated matrices would match those of the observed matrix. Results of model simulations suggest that the true probability of a species occupying any given site cannot be estimated unambiguously. Nearly all of the models tested were shown to bias simulation matrices toward low levels of nestedness, increasing the probability of a Type I statistical error. Further, desired marginal totals could be obtained only through ad-hoc manipulation of the calculated probabilities. Paradoxically, when such results are achieved, the model is shown to have little statistical power to detect nestedness. This is because nestedness is determined largely by the marginal totals of the matrix themselves, as suggested earlier by Wright and Reeves. We conclude that at the present time, the best null model for nested subset patterns may be one based on equal probabilities of occurrence for all species. Examples of such models are readily available in the literature.
随机化模型,通常被称为“零”模型,自20世纪70年代以来已广泛应用于物种群落和生物地理格局的研究中。最近,它们被用于检验占据空间细分栖息地(如群岛和陆地栖息地斑块)的物种集合中的嵌套物种子集模式(或嵌套性)。当占据小的或物种贫乏地点的物种强烈倾向于形成更丰富物种集合的适当子集时,就会出现嵌套性。在本文中,我们研究了几种已发表的模拟模型以无偏方式从简单的物种-地点存在-缺失数据矩阵中检测嵌套子集模式的能力。每种方法都试图通过遵循这样的假设来融入生物现实性:即产生自然界中观察到的模式的生态过程,如果使用相同的物种和景观配置重复多次,将产生具有与观察到的相同数量物种且相同数量岛屿上存在相同物种的岛屿。用数学术语来说,许多模拟矩阵的平均边际总数(列和行总和)将与观察矩阵的相匹配。模型模拟结果表明,一个物种占据任何给定地点的真实概率无法明确估计。几乎所有测试的模型都显示出将模拟矩阵偏向低水平的嵌套性,增加了I型统计错误的概率。此外,期望的边际总数只能通过对计算出的概率进行特别操作来获得。矛盾的是,当取得这样的结果时,该模型显示出检测嵌套性的统计能力很小。这是因为嵌套性很大程度上由矩阵本身的边际总数决定,正如赖特和里夫斯早些时候所指出的那样。我们得出结论,目前,用于嵌套子集模式的最佳零模型可能是基于所有物种出现概率相等的模型。文献中很容易找到此类模型的示例。