Pöysä H, Elmberg J, Sjöberg K, Nummi P
Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Evo Game Research Station, Kaitalammintie 75, FIN-16970 Evo, Finland e-mail:
Department of Animal Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-901 83 Umeå, Sweden, , , , , , SE.
Oecologia. 2000 Mar;122(4):582-586. doi: 10.1007/PL00008858.
By combining and reanalysing data from two independent field experiments we explore whether food limitation at the brood stage affects habitat selection in nesting mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). In an introduction experiment we found that, independent of treatment, some study lakes remained empty of wild mallard pairs ("empty lakes"), whereas on other lakes introduced birds attracted wild mallards ("attractive lakes"). In the other experiment we used mallard ducklings to address brood-stage food limitation by studying mass change of ducklings. We found that ducklings foraging on lakes that did not attract wild mallard pairs in the introduction experiment gained much less mass than those foraging on attractive lakes. In most cases ducklings even lost mass in the empty-lake foraging trials, providing strong evidence for food limitation. Therefore, lakes that remained empty of wild mallard pairs in the introduction experiment proved to be inferior brood habitats, particularly in terms of food. Our results give insight into the mechanisms underlying the general habitat selection hypotheses, specifically the ideal preemptive and conspecific attraction rules. The results further support our earlier conclusion that mallards do not use the ideal preemptive rule when selecting nesting lakes. However, conspecific attraction may not be generally applicable either, because, independent of the presence of introduced conspecifics, wild mallards somehow anticipated the low quality of the empty lakes as brood-rearing habitats and made their habitat-selection decision accordingly.
通过合并和重新分析来自两个独立野外实验的数据,我们探究了育雏阶段的食物限制是否会影响绿头鸭(Anas platyrhynchos)筑巢时的栖息地选择。在一个引入实验中,我们发现,无论处理方式如何,一些研究湖泊中没有野生绿头鸭配对(“空湖”),而在其他湖泊中引入的鸟类吸引了野生绿头鸭(“有吸引力的湖”)。在另一个实验中,我们通过研究雏鸭的体重变化,利用绿头鸭雏鸭来解决育雏阶段的食物限制问题。我们发现,在引入实验中,在没有吸引野生绿头鸭配对的湖泊上觅食的雏鸭体重增加量远低于在有吸引力的湖泊上觅食的雏鸭。在大多数情况下,雏鸭在空湖觅食试验中甚至体重减轻,这为食物限制提供了有力证据。因此,在引入实验中没有野生绿头鸭配对的湖泊被证明是较差的育雏栖息地,尤其是在食物方面。我们的结果深入了解了一般栖息地选择假说背后的机制,特别是理想的抢先占有和同种吸引规则。结果进一步支持了我们早期的结论,即绿头鸭在选择筑巢湖泊时不使用理想的抢先占有规则。然而,同种吸引可能也并不普遍适用,因为无论是否存在引入的同种个体,野生绿头鸭都以某种方式预见到了空湖作为育雏栖息地的低质量,并据此做出了栖息地选择决定。