Callaham M A, Whiles M R, Meyer C K, Brock B L, Charlton R E
232 Ackert Hall, Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-4901, USA e-mail:
Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-4004, USA, , , , , , US.
Oecologia. 2000 Jun;123(4):535-542. doi: 10.1007/s004420000335.
The emergence phenology and feeding ecology of annual cicadas in tallgrass prairie are poorly documented. However, these large insects are abundant, and their annual emergence represents a potentially important flux of energy and nutrients from belowground to aboveground. We conducted a study at Konza Prairie Research Natural Area in eastern Kansas to characterize and quantify cicada emergence and associated energy and nutrient fluxes. We established emergence trap transects in three habitat types (upland prairie, lowland prairie, and riparian forest), and collected cicadas every 3 days from May to September. A subset of trapped cicadas was used for species- and sex-specific mass, nutrient, and stable isotope analyses. Five species were trapped during the study, of which three were dominant. Cicadetta calliope and Tibicen aurifera exhibited significantly higher emergence production in upland prairie than in lowland prairie, and were not captured in forested sites at all. T. dorsata emerged from all three habitat types, and though not significant, showed a trend of greater abundance in lowland grasslands. Two less abundant species, T. pruinosa and T. lyricen, emerged exclusively from forested habitats. Nitrogen fluxes associated with total cicada emergence were estimated to be ∼4 kg N ha year in both grassland habitats, and 1.01 kg N ha year in forested sites. Results of stable isotope analyses showed clear patterns of resource partitioning among dominant cicada species emerging from grassland sites. T. aurifera and C. calliope had δC and δN signatures indicative of feeding on shallowly rooted C plants such as the warm-season grasses dominant in tallgrass prairie ecosystems, whereas T. dorsata signatures suggested preferential feeding on more deeply rooted C plants.
高草草原上年生蝉的羽化物候和取食生态学鲜有文献记载。然而,这些大型昆虫数量众多,它们每年的羽化代表着从地下到地上潜在的重要能量和养分流动。我们在堪萨斯州东部的孔扎草原研究自然区开展了一项研究,以描述和量化蝉的羽化以及相关的能量和养分流动。我们在三种栖息地类型(高地草原、低地草原和河岸森林)设置了羽化陷阱样带,并在5月至9月期间每3天收集一次蝉。捕获的一部分蝉用于进行物种和性别的质量、养分及稳定同位素分析。研究期间捕获了5个物种,其中3个占主导地位。Calliope蝉和金色提比蝉在高地草原的羽化量显著高于低地草原,且在森林地带根本没有捕获到。背纹提比蝉在所有三种栖息地类型中都有羽化,虽然不显著,但在低地草原呈现出数量更多的趋势。另外两个数量较少的物种,粉状提比蝉和抒情提比蝉,仅在森林栖息地羽化。据估计,两个草原栖息地与蝉总羽化相关的氮通量约为4千克氮/公顷·年,森林地带为1.01千克氮/公顷·年。稳定同位素分析结果显示,从草原栖息地羽化的优势蝉物种之间存在明显的资源分配模式。金色提比蝉和Calliope蝉的δC和δN特征表明它们以浅根C4植物为食,如高草草原生态系统中占主导地位的暖季草,而背纹提比蝉的特征表明其偏好取食更深根的C4植物。