Schroder Gene D, Rosenzweig Michael L
Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, 87131, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Oecologia. 1975 Mar;19(1):9-28. doi: 10.1007/BF00377586.
The populations of two coexisting species of Dipodomys (Heteromyidae, Rodentia) were manipulated on 10, large, unenclosed, trapping grids. These manipulations revealed that, although many kangaroo rats are established residents in an area, a large number are transient individuals who quickly occupy vacated habitats. On plots from which residents had been removed, transients settled at rates of up to 5% of carrying capacity per day. These immigrants were invariably of the same species that was removed, indicating a strong element of intraspecific competition with little or no evidence of competition between the species.Trapping records suggest that these species avoid competition through habitat selection. Dipodomys ordii prefer a grassier habitat, and D. merriami a habitat dominated by creosote bush. Apparent overlap in their utilization of habitats, based on sites of capture, predicts competition coefficients to be higher than those permitted by the theory of limiting similarity and much higher than those actually shown by the perturbation experiments.This study demonstrates the dangers of estimating alpha without experimentation. This is especially true in cases where habitat selection may be important, since organisms may travel in habitats without collecting resources therein. Our results are discussed in light of a theory which examines the optimal (rather than tolerable) amount of overlap in habitat utilization between two potential competitors in a mixed habitat. This theory predicts that the pressure of natural selection should eliminate the interspecific competition entirely.However, the conclusion that the interspecific competitive alpha is zero does not lead to the conclusion that interspecific competition is unimportant in the system. Instead, if our interpretation is correct, such competition has molded the system, and were there not a continual threat of interspecific competition, the habitat specializations would soon disappear.
在10个大型、未封闭的诱捕网格上,对两种共存的更格卢鼠属(异鼠科,啮齿目)动物的种群进行了操控。这些操控表明,尽管许多更格卢鼠是某一区域的常住居民,但大量个体是短暂停留者,它们会迅速占据腾出的栖息地。在常住居民被移除的地块上,短暂停留者的定居速度高达每天承载能力的5%。这些迁入者总是与被移除的物种相同,这表明种内竞争的因素很强,而种间竞争很少或几乎没有证据。诱捕记录表明,这些物种通过栖息地选择来避免竞争。奥氏更格卢鼠更喜欢更茂盛的栖息地,而梅氏更格卢鼠则更喜欢以石炭酸灌木为主的栖息地。基于捕获地点,它们在栖息地利用上明显的重叠预测竞争系数会高于极限相似性理论所允许的系数,且远高于扰动实验实际显示的系数。这项研究证明了在没有实验的情况下估计α的危险性。在栖息地选择可能很重要的情况下尤其如此,因为生物体可能在栖息地中移动但不在其中获取资源。我们根据一种理论来讨论我们的结果,该理论研究了混合栖息地中两个潜在竞争者在栖息地利用上的最佳(而非可容忍)重叠量。该理论预测自然选择的压力应完全消除种间竞争。然而,种间竞争α为零的结论并不导致种间竞争在该系统中不重要的结论。相反,如果我们的解释正确,这种竞争塑造了这个系统,而且如果没有种间竞争的持续威胁,栖息地特化很快就会消失。