Erdelen Martin
Zoologisches Institut, 1. Lehrstuhl, Universität Köln, Weyertal 119, D-5000, Köln 41, Germany.
Oecologia. 1984 Feb;61(2):277-284. doi: 10.1007/BF00396773.
In order to investigate relations between bird community and vegetation structure indices, with a focus on methodological problems, 22 study plots ranging from grassland to old forests were selected. Breeding passerine birds were censused by means of the mapping method. Vegetation structure was assessed by measuring cover values at 12 different heights (0.25 to 32 m). Simple indices (e.g. number of bird species, NRSPEC, and number of layers with vegetation, NSTRAT) as well as diversity values (bird and plant species diversity, BSD and PSD, resp.; foliage height diversity, FHD, and other indices of structural diversity) were calculated. Vegetation structure diversity, but not floristic diversity PSD, was found to be correlated with BSD. However, vegetation structure indices differed in several respects. The much-discussed BSD/FHD correlation held only if structurally different plots (forests and low vegetation) were included in the analysis, but not if the evaluation was restricted to forests alone. The index DT, suggested by Blondel and Cuvillier (1977) proved to be more useful, being more highly correlated to BSD, and more robust as to study site selection. It also offers the advantage of discerning between a vertical (DV) and a horizontal (DH) component. Due to methodological divergencies, it was found virtually impossible to make detailed comparisons, in terms of biological concepts, of the results of other authors and those of the present study, the problem of comparability apparently deserving more discussion than it has received hitherto. The designation "FHD", esp., is used for numerical values arrived at by quite divergent field methods and computational procedures. It is concluded that simple indices (e.g. NRSPEC and NSTRAT), which are demonstrated to be good predictors of more complex ones (BSD and FHD, resp.), should be preferred as they permit better standardization and easier, more direct interpretation.
为了研究鸟类群落与植被结构指数之间的关系,重点关注方法学问题,我们选取了22个从草地到老龄林的研究样地。通过绘图法对繁殖雀形目鸟类进行了统计。通过测量12个不同高度(0.25至32米)的覆盖值来评估植被结构。计算了简单指数(如鸟类物种数量NRSPEC和植被层数NSTRAT)以及多样性值(鸟类和植物物种多样性BSD和PSD,分别为;叶高多样性FHD以及其他结构多样性指数)。结果发现,植被结构多样性而非植物区系多样性PSD与BSD相关。然而,植被结构指数在几个方面存在差异。备受讨论的BSD/FHD相关性仅在分析中纳入结构不同的样地(森林和低植被)时成立,而若仅将评估限制在森林中则不成立。由Blondel和Cuvillier(1977)提出的指数DT被证明更有用,它与BSD的相关性更高,并且在研究地点选择方面更稳健。它还具有区分垂直(DV)和水平(DH)分量的优势。由于方法上的差异,实际上发现几乎不可能从生物学概念的角度对其他作者的结果与本研究的结果进行详细比较,可比性问题显然值得比迄今所得到的更多讨论。特别是“FHD”这一名称,用于通过相当不同的野外方法和计算程序得出的数值。结论是,简单指数(如NRSPEC和NSTRAT)被证明是更复杂指数(分别为BSD和FHD)的良好预测指标,应优先选用,因为它们能实现更好的标准化,且解释更简单、更直接。