Alatalo Rauno V
Department of Zoology, University of Oulu, SF-90100, Oulu 10, Finland.
Oecologia. 1980 May;45(2):190-196. doi: 10.1007/BF00346459.
The five most abundant species were included in a year-round study with respect to six foraging niche dimensions. Approximately full multidimensional utilization functions were used for niche metrics. During summer foraging overlaps were invariably high, but in other seasons periodically lower. Foraging site breadth was lower in winter, when fewer sites are profitable for foraging than in summer. Feeding posture versatility, by contrast, was highest in winter. Seasonal foraging shifts were very prominent, as great in fact as between-species differences. Often seasonal trends were parallel in different species. Niche axes of macrohabitat-type (e.g. tree) were more open for foraging variation and axes of microhabitat-type (tree part) more rigid. Among the resident species seasonal variation in foraging was greatest in Regulus regulus and Parus cristatus, whereas the foraging behaviour was more stable for P. montanus (an abundant species with broad niche), perhaps owing to greater intraspecific competition. In these northern forests foliage-gleaners must be versatile generalists to cope with the unpredictable resources, and thus they overlap broadly in their general resource niches which are determined by their genetically fixed cost and benefit relations to each resource type. Anyhow, presumably during periodical food shortage, the actual resource uses adjusted by resource availability and competition may overlap narrowly.
就六个觅食生态位维度而言,研究选取了五种数量最多的物种进行全年研究。生态位指标采用了近似完整的多维利用函数。夏季觅食重叠率始终很高,但在其他季节则周期性降低。冬季觅食地点广度较低,因为冬季可进行有利可图觅食的地点比夏季少。相比之下,冬季的取食姿势多样性最高。季节性觅食转移非常显著,实际上与物种间差异一样大。不同物种的季节性趋势往往是平行的。宏观栖息地类型(如树木)的生态位轴在觅食变化方面更为开放,而微观栖息地类型(树的部分)的生态位轴则更为严格。在留鸟物种中,柳莺和凤头山雀的觅食季节性变化最大,而大山雀(一种生态位宽泛的常见物种)的觅食行为则更为稳定,这可能是由于种内竞争更为激烈。在这些北方森林中,叶层觅食者必须是适应能力强的通才,以应对不可预测的资源,因此它们在由其与每种资源类型的遗传固定成本和收益关系所决定的总体资源生态位上广泛重叠。无论如何,大概在周期性食物短缺期间,由资源可用性和竞争所调整的实际资源利用可能会有狭窄的重叠。