• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种生长在干旱土壤中的牧草的生根模式与水分关系

Rooting pattern and water relations of three pasture grasses growing in drying soil.

作者信息

Molyneux D E, Davies W J

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Lancaster, Bailrigg, LA1 4YQ, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1983 May;58(2):220-224. doi: 10.1007/BF00399220.

DOI:10.1007/BF00399220
PMID:28310581
Abstract

Seedlings of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. S23), cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L. S37) and Timothy (Phleum pratense L. S48) were rooted into tubes of soil and plants were either watered well or remained unwatered for a period of seven days. Measurements were made of root water relations and of growth of roots and shoots. Root turgor of Dactylis was larger than that of Lolium and Phleum. As a result of accumulation of solutes, turgor of Dactylis and Lolium was maintained as the soil dried. Phleum roots lost turgor in drying soil and this characteristic correlated well with a water stress-induced reduction in root and shoot growth. Soil drying had marked effects on the rooting patterns of two of the three species. Phleum seedlings which, in wet soil are deep rooting were restricted in their depth of rooting, while roots of water-stressed Dactylis seedlings grew deeper into the profile than did roots of well-watered plants. When water was withheld from plants, deeper rooting apparently resulted in a more favourable shoot water balance which had a beneficial effect on shoot growth.

摘要

多年生黑麦草(Lolium perenne L. S23)、鸭茅(Dactylis glomerata L. S37)和梯牧草(Phleum pratense L. S48)的幼苗被种植在装有土壤的试管中,植株要么得到充分浇水,要么连续七天不浇水。对根系水分关系以及根和茎的生长进行了测量。鸭茅的根膨压大于黑麦草和梯牧草。由于溶质积累,随着土壤变干,鸭茅和黑麦草的膨压得以维持。梯牧草的根在干燥土壤中失去膨压,这一特性与水分胁迫导致的根和茎生长减少密切相关。土壤干燥对三种植物中的两种的生根模式有显著影响。在湿润土壤中深扎根的梯牧草幼苗,其扎根深度受到限制,而水分胁迫下的鸭茅幼苗的根比充分浇水的植株的根更深地扎入土壤剖面。当不给植株浇水时,更深的扎根显然导致了更有利的地上部水分平衡,这对地上部生长有有益影响。

相似文献

1
Rooting pattern and water relations of three pasture grasses growing in drying soil.三种生长在干旱土壤中的牧草的生根模式与水分关系
Oecologia. 1983 May;58(2):220-224. doi: 10.1007/BF00399220.
2
Root growth and water relations of oak and birch seedlings.橡树和桦树幼苗的根系生长与水分关系
Oecologia. 1981 Jan;51(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/BF00540904.
3
Influence of soil drying on root development, water relations and leaf growth of Ceratonia siliqua L.土壤干燥对长角豆根系发育、水分关系及叶片生长的影响
Oecologia. 1991 Sep;88(1):41-47. doi: 10.1007/BF00328401.
4
Comparison of growth performance of Lolium perenne L., Dactylis glomerata L. and Agropyron elongatum (Host.) P. Beauv. for erosion control in Turkey.黑麦草、鸭茅和高羊茅在土耳其用于控制侵蚀的生长性能比较。
J Environ Biol. 2003 Jan;24(1):45-53.
5
Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plants.水分胁迫下玉米植株根和地上部分的溶质调节和生长。
Planta. 1979 Oct;147(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00384589.
6
Water use efficiency and shoot biomass production under water limitation is negatively correlated to the discrimination against C in the C grasses Dactylis glomerata, Festuca arundinacea and Phalaris arundinacea.在水分限制下,水分利用效率和地上生物量生产与 C 草属(Dactylis glomerata、Festuca arundinacea 和 Phalaris arundinacea)中 C 的歧视呈负相关。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017 Apr;113:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.01.021. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
7
Response of Pasture Grasses to Organic Fertilizer Produced from Black Soldier Fly Frass.牧草对黑水虻虫粪制成的有机肥料的反应。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Mar 25;13(7):943. doi: 10.3390/plants13070943.
8
Do shallow soil, low water availability, or their combination increase the competition between grasses with different root systems in karst soil?浅薄的土壤、低水分可利用性或它们的组合是否会加剧喀斯特土壤中具有不同根系的草本植物之间的竞争?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(11):10640-10651. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8675-4. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
9
Solute accumulation in leaves and roots of woody plants subjected to water stress.遭受水分胁迫的木本植物叶片和根系中的溶质积累。
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;32(3):323-332. doi: 10.1007/BF00345110.
10
Can differences in root responses to soil drying and compaction explain differences in performance of trees growing on landfill sites?根系对土壤干燥和压实的反应差异能否解释垃圾填埋场上树木生长表现的差异?
Tree Physiol. 1999 Jul;19(9):619-624. doi: 10.1093/treephys/19.9.619.

引用本文的文献

1
Drought negates growth stimulation due to root herbivory in pasture grasses.干旱会抵消因牧草根系遭受食草动物啃食而产生的生长刺激作用。
Oecologia. 2018 Nov;188(3):777-789. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4244-x. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
2
Gaps in the capacity of modern forage crops to adapt to the changing climate in northern Europe.现代饲料作物适应北欧气候变化的能力存在差距。
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(1):81-100. doi: 10.1007/s11027-016-9729-5. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Grassland resistance and resilience after drought depends on management intensity and species richness.

本文引用的文献

1
Root growth and water relations of oak and birch seedlings.橡树和桦树幼苗的根系生长与水分关系
Oecologia. 1981 Jan;51(3):343-350. doi: 10.1007/BF00540904.
2
Solute accumulation in leaves and roots of woody plants subjected to water stress.遭受水分胁迫的木本植物叶片和根系中的溶质积累。
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;32(3):323-332. doi: 10.1007/BF00345110.
3
Solute regulation and growth by roots and shoots of water-stressed maize plants.水分胁迫下玉米植株根和地上部分的溶质调节和生长。
草地在干旱后的抵抗力和恢复力取决于管理强度和物种丰富度。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036992. Epub 2012 May 16.
4
Effects of nursery preconditioning through mycorrhizal inoculation and drought in Arbutus unedo L. plants.菌根接种和干旱对杨梅幼苗预培养的影响。
Mycorrhiza. 2011 Jan;21(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0310-x. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
Planta. 1979 Oct;147(1):43-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00384589.
4
Complete turgor maintenance at low water potentials in the elongating region of maize leaves.玉米叶片伸长区在低水势下维持完全膨压。
Plant Physiol. 1982 May;69(5):1145-9. doi: 10.1104/pp.69.5.1145.
5
Analysis of the dynamic and steady-state responses of growth rate and turgor pressure to changes in cell parameters.分析生长速率和膨压对细胞参数变化的动态和稳态响应。
Plant Physiol. 1981 Dec;68(6):1439-46. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.6.1439.