• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大化觅食效率并最小化暴露于捕食者的时间:黑顶山雀的一种权衡。

Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee.

作者信息

Lima Steven L

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Rochester, 14627, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00378552.

DOI:10.1007/BF00378552
PMID:28310812
Abstract

Animals often must feed away from protective cover, sometimes at a considerable risk of being preyed upon. Feeding at the maximum rate while away from cover may simultaneously minimize the time spent exposed to predators, but this is not always the case. Under some circumstances, carrying prey items to protective cover before they are consumed will minimize the time spent exposed to predators, whereas feeding at maximum efficiency (staying to eat prey where they are found) will actually increase the time spent exposed to predators. Whether or not there is a conflict between maximizing foraging efficiency and minimizing exposure time, depends upon the travel time to cover relative to the handling time of a prey item; short handling times and/or long travel times are associated with the no-conflict situation, whereas the conflict situation is associated with long handling times and/or short travel times to cover. Free-ranging chickadees foraging at an artificial patch at various distances from cover can distinguish between these two foraging situations. When there is no conflict, they stay and eat at the patch. Their behavior in the conflict situation indicates that they are tradingoff foraging considerations against the risk of predation. When the cost of carrying is low and the benefit gained is high, the chickadees elect to carry items to cover; they tend to stay and eat at the patch when the relative magnitudes of costs and benefits are reversed.

摘要

动物常常必须在没有保护掩体的情况下觅食,有时面临着相当大的被捕食风险。在没有掩体的情况下以最快速度进食,可能会同时将暴露于捕食者的时间减至最短,但情况并非总是如此。在某些情况下,在吃掉猎物之前将其带到保护掩体处,会将暴露于捕食者的时间减至最短,而以最高效率进食(在发现猎物的地方停留进食)实际上会增加暴露于捕食者的时间。觅食效率最大化与暴露时间最小化之间是否存在冲突,取决于前往掩体的时间与处理猎物的时间之比;处理时间短和/或前往掩体的时间长与无冲突情况相关,而冲突情况则与处理时间长和/或前往掩体的时间短相关。在距掩体不同距离的人工斑块处觅食的自由放养的山雀能够区分这两种觅食情况。当没有冲突时,它们会留在斑块处进食。它们在冲突情况下的行为表明,它们在权衡觅食考量与被捕食风险。当携带成本低且获得的收益高时,山雀会选择将食物带到掩体处;当成本和收益的相对大小相反时,它们往往会留在斑块处进食。

相似文献

1
Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee.最大化觅食效率并最小化暴露于捕食者的时间:黑顶山雀的一种权衡。
Oecologia. 1985 Apr;66(1):60-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00378552.
2
Carrying food items to cover for consumption: the behavior of ten bird species feeding under the risk of predation.携带食物以备食用:十种鸟类在被捕食风险下觅食的行为
Oecologia. 1987 Jan;71(2):286-294. doi: 10.1007/BF00377297.
3
Prey selection and foraging period of the predaceous rocky intertidal snail, Acanthina punctulata.捕食性潮间带岩石蜗牛Acanthina punctulata的猎物选择与觅食期
Oecologia. 1974 Dec;17(4):293-316. doi: 10.1007/BF00345748.
4
Predator odor exposure increases food-carrying behavior in rats.接触捕食者气味会增加大鼠的搬运食物行为。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Feb 1;154:15-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
5
Foraging and vulnerability traits modify predator-prey body mass allometry: freshwater macroinvertebrates as a case study.觅食和脆弱性特征改变了捕食者-猎物的体质量比例关系:以淡水大型无脊椎动物为案例研究。
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Sep;82(5):1031-41. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12078. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
6
Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits.作为一种景观效应的捕食行为:猎物物种在捕食风险与保护效益之间的权衡。
J Anim Ecol. 2007 May;76(3):619-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01233.x.
7
The effects of food availability and distance to protective cover on the winter foraging behaviour of tits (Aves: Parus).食物可获得性和与庇护所距离对山雀(雀形目:山雀科)冬季觅食行为的影响
Oecologia. 2001 Oct;129(2):312-320. doi: 10.1007/s004420100713. Epub 2001 Oct 1.
8
Do predators influence the behaviour of bats?捕食者会影响蝙蝠的行为吗?
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013 Aug;88(3):626-44. doi: 10.1111/brv.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
9
Daphnid morphology deters fish predators.水蚤的形态能威慑鱼类捕食者。
Oecologia. 1998 Oct;116(4):556-564. doi: 10.1007/s004420050621.
10
Short-term foraging costs and long-term fueling rates in central-place foraging swans revealed by giving-up exploitation times.通过放弃利用时间揭示的中心地觅食天鹅的短期觅食成本和长期能量补充率。
Am Nat. 2007 May;169(5):609-20. doi: 10.1086/513114. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive control of memory in a food-storing and a non-storing bird species.食物储存型和非食物储存型鸟类中记忆的认知控制
Anim Cogn. 2025 May 5;28(1):36. doi: 10.1007/s10071-025-01954-1.
2
Land-based foraging by polar bears reveals sexual conflict outside mating season.陆基觅食的北极熊揭示了交配季节外的性冲突。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 31;14(1):20275. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71258-w.
3
The Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Spatial Margin of Safety Calculations.内侧前额叶皮层在空间安全边际计算中的作用。

本文引用的文献

1
An anti-predator response in the great tit (Parus major): Is it tuned to predator risk?大山雀(Parus major)的反捕食者反应:它是否与捕食风险相适应?
Oecologia. 1983 Oct;60(1):83-88. doi: 10.1007/BF00379324.
2
Optimal activity times and habitat choice of moose.驼鹿的最佳活动时间与栖息地选择
Oecologia. 1981 Feb;48(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00346984.
3
Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?最优行为:觅食者能否平衡两种相互冲突的需求?
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 21;44(34):e1162222024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1162-22.2024.
4
Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis GABA neurons are necessary for changes in foraging behaviour following an innate threat.终纹床核的 GABA 神经元对于先天威胁后觅食行为的改变是必要的。
Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Oct;58(7):3630-3649. doi: 10.1111/ejn.16137. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
5
The evolution of prey-attraction strategies in spiders: the interplay between foraging and predator avoidance.蜘蛛猎物吸引策略的演化:觅食与逃避捕食者之间的相互作用。
Oecologia. 2023 Aug;202(4):669-684. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05427-5. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
So many choices, so little time: Food preference and movement vary with the landscape of fear.选择众多,时间却少:食物偏好和活动会因恐惧情境而有所不同。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 26;13(7):e10330. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10330. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis GABA neurons are necessary for changes in foraging behavior following an innate threat.终纹床核γ-氨基丁酸能神经元对于先天威胁后觅食行为的改变是必要的。
bioRxiv. 2023 Feb 25:2023.02.25.530051. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.25.530051.
8
Resident birds are more behaviourally plastic than migrants.留鸟比候鸟更具行为可塑性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 6;12(1):5743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09834-1.
9
Inconsistent evolution and growth-survival tradeoffs in .在 中,进化和生长-存活权衡的不一致性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 23;289(1969):20212072. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2072. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Evaluating the accuracy and biological meaning of visits to RFID-enabled bird feeders using video.使用视频评估对配备射频识别(RFID)的鸟类喂食器的访问的准确性和生物学意义。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Nov 16;11(23):17132-17141. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8352. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Science. 1980 Nov 28;210(4473):1041-3. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4473.1041.