Peters R H, Cloutier S, Dubé D, Evans A, Hastings P, Kaiser H, Kohn D, Sarwer-Foner B
Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Ave. Dr. Penfield, H3A 1B1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Oecologia. 1988 Jan;74(4):612-616. doi: 10.1007/BF00380061.
Branch sampling of branch diameter and fruit crop on 22 species of Barbadian trees and shrubs provided sufficient data to build regressions between plant size and fruit crop weight. Orchard plants bear much more fruit than wild, feral or garden plants of similar size, but this difference disappears in multiple regression of fruit crop weight (F in g, fresh mass) on branch or stem diameter (D in cm) and individual fruit weight (W in g): F=22D W. This explains 89% of the variation in F and successfully predicts crop weight for wild tropical and temperate trees and shrubs, but underestimated the crops on commercial, temperate, fruit trees by an order of magnitude. Comparisons of crop weight for feral, wild, and garden plants (F) using a simple regression F=47D show that crop weight is a minor load relative to branch weight for larger branches. Although fruit crops represent a declining proportion of total plant weight as plants become larger, the crops become larger relative to leaf and twig weight and in this sense, reproductive investment increases in larger plants. Finally, our equations, combined with the self-thinning rule, suggest that stands of large species of fruit plants produce more fruit per unit of land area than stands of small ones.
对巴巴多斯22种乔木和灌木的树枝直径和果实产量进行分支采样,获得了足够的数据来建立植株大小与果实产量之间的回归关系。果园植株比大小相似的野生、半野生或园林植株结的果实多得多,但在果实产量(F,单位为克,鲜重)对树枝或树干直径(D,单位为厘米)和单果重量(W,单位为克)的多元回归中,这种差异消失了:F = 22DW。这解释了F中89%的变异,并成功预测了野生热带和温带乔木及灌木的产量,但对商业温带果树的产量低估了一个数量级。使用简单回归F = 47D对野生、半野生和园林植株的产量(F)进行比较表明,对于较大的树枝,果实产量相对于树枝重量来说是较小的负载。尽管随着植株变大,果实产量占植株总重量的比例下降,但相对于叶片和嫩枝重量,果实产量变得更大,从这个意义上说,较大植株的生殖投资增加。最后,我们的方程与自疏法则相结合表明,大型果树品种的林分每单位土地面积的果实产量比小型果树品种的林分高。