Suppr超能文献

波动田鼠种群中的空间动态。

Spatial dynamics in fluctuating vole populations.

作者信息

Hansson Lennart

机构信息

Department of Wildlife Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1990 Dec;85(2):213-217. doi: 10.1007/BF00319403.

Abstract

Patterns and consistency of distribution, spatial and temporal components, and the extent of spatial density-dependence were compared between semi-cyclic and cyclic populations of the vole species Clethrionomys glareolus and Microtus agrestis in south-central and north Sweden. Cyclic populations were less clumped and only C. glareolus showed a consistency in distribution between years. Spatial variation contributed little to the distributions in cyclic populations while the spatial and temporal variations were of the same magnitude in the semi-cyclic populations. The latter populations could be subdivided into areas with different spatial and temporal components. The spatial density-dependence increased from increase to decline years in C. glareolus but not in M. agrestis, which differed conspicuously between reregions in population development. The data imply that spatial dynamics should be considered as much as temporal ones for non-cyclic populations, that the same regulating or limiting factors may be at work in both spatial and temporal components and that, in addition, social behaviour may be important in explaining spatial dynamics. However, the latter effects may be fairly species-specific.

摘要

在瑞典中南部和北部,对棕背䶄(Clethrionomys glareolus)和草原田鼠(Microtus agrestis)半周期性种群和周期性种群之间的分布模式与一致性、空间和时间成分以及空间密度依赖性程度进行了比较。周期性种群的聚集程度较低,只有棕背䶄在年份间表现出分布的一致性。空间变异对周期性种群分布的贡献较小,而在半周期性种群中,空间和时间变异的幅度相同。后一种群可细分为具有不同空间和时间成分的区域。棕背䶄的空间密度依赖性从增长年到衰退年增加,而草原田鼠则没有,这在种群发展的区域间差异显著。数据表明,对于非周期性种群,空间动态应与时间动态同样予以考虑,空间和时间成分可能存在相同的调节或限制因素,此外,社会行为在解释空间动态方面可能很重要。然而,后一种影响可能具有相当的物种特异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验