Gamboa George J, Berven Keith A, Schemidt Randy A, Fishwild Thomas G, Jankens Kelli M
Department of Biological Sciences, Oakland University, 48309-4401, Rochester, MI, USA.
Oecologia. 1991 May;86(3):319-324. doi: 10.1007/BF00317596.
We investigated kin recognition by larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) in blind laboratory experiments using spatial affinity as a recognition assay. Tadpoles reared with full-sibs displayed a significant preference for familiar full-sibs over unfamiliar non-kin, but failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs and unfamiliar paternal half-sibs. Tadpoles reared in social isolation (with or without maternal egg jelly) from the two-celled embryonic stage displayed a significant preference for unfamiliar full-sibs over unfamiliar non-kin. Tadpoles reared on a meat diet with their full-sibs: 1) exhibited a significant preference for unfamiliar full-sibs fed meat over unfamiliar non-kin fed meat, 2) failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs fed lettuce and unfamiliar non-kin fed meat, 3) exhibited a significant preference for unfamiliar non-kin fed meat over unfamiliar non-lin fed lettuce, 4) failed to discriminate between unfamiliar full-sibs fed meat and unfamiliar full-sibs fed lettuce, and 5) displayed a significant spatial preference for odors associated with meat (a familiar food) over odors associated with lettuce (an unfamiliar food). Our results, together with those of Cornell et al. (1989), indicate that the recognition cue of larval R. sylvatica has both genetic and environmental (dietary) components. Our findings establish that previous exposure to maternal egg jelly, kin, or conspecifics is not necessary for the development of kin recognition ability in larval R. sylvatica. Our results are more consistent with the self-learning of recognition cues (a form of phenotype matching) than with a recognition mechanism that involves a genetically fixed recognition template. Finally, our results indicate that increasing similarity between the recognition template and perceived cue does not necessarily result in increasing spatial affinity for kin.
我们在盲法实验室实验中,以空间亲和力作为识别测定方法,研究了北美林蛙幼体的亲属识别能力。与全同胞一起饲养的蝌蚪,对熟悉的全同胞表现出显著的偏好,相较于不熟悉的非亲属,但无法区分不熟悉的全同胞和不熟悉的父系半同胞。从双细胞胚胎阶段开始就处于社会隔离状态(有或没有母本卵胶膜)饲养的蝌蚪,对不熟悉的全同胞表现出显著的偏好,相较于不熟悉的非亲属。与全同胞一起以肉类为食饲养的蝌蚪:1)对以肉为食的不熟悉全同胞表现出显著的偏好,相较于以肉为食的不熟悉非亲属;2)无法区分以生菜为食的不熟悉全同胞和以肉为食的不熟悉非亲属;3)对以肉为食的不熟悉非亲属表现出显著的偏好,相较于以生菜为食的不熟悉非亲属;4)无法区分以肉为食的不熟悉全同胞和以生菜为食的不熟悉全同胞;5)对与肉(一种熟悉的食物)相关的气味表现出显著的空间偏好,相较于与生菜(一种不熟悉的食物)相关的气味。我们的结果,与康奈尔等人(1989年)的结果一起,表明北美林蛙幼体的识别线索既有遗传成分,也有环境(饮食)成分。我们的发现表明,先前接触母本卵胶膜、亲属或同种个体对于北美林蛙幼体亲属识别能力的发展并非必要。我们的结果与识别线索的自我学习(一种表型匹配形式)更为一致,而非与涉及基因固定识别模板的识别机制一致。最后,我们的结果表明,识别模板与感知线索之间相似度的增加,不一定会导致对亲属空间亲和力的增加。