Langvatn Rolf, Hanley Thomas A
Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Tungasletta 2, N-7005, Trondheim, Norway.
Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, P.O. Box 20909, 99802-0909, Juneau, AK, USA.
Oecologia. 1993 Aug;95(2):164-170. doi: 10.1007/BF00323486.
We tested the idea that ruminants allocate their feeding time to habitat patches in relation to foraging efficiency. We used five tame red deer (Cervus elaphus) in an enclosure planted with four treatment of timothy grass (Phleum pratense) differing in their stage of growth. Older swards offered higher biomass but lower nutritional quality than younger swards. We observed time spent feeding in each treatment during each of seven trials. We measured goodness-of-fit between observed times and predictions from two alternative hypotheses differing in optimization strategy (maximizing versus matching), and a third, null hypothesis. We tested the hypotheses using two alternative currecies: digestible protein, and digestible dry matter or energy. Although digestible protein concentration and dry-matter digestibility were highly correlated (r=0.763, P<0.001), the wider range of digestible protein made it the much more sensitive measure of forage quality. Distributions of feeding time closely matched estimated intake rates of digestible protein (R =0.899) across all animals and trials. The other hypotheses were rejected. The results have important ecological implications in showing the underlying role of food in the selection of habitat by ruminants, and that simple, mechanistic models of forage intake and digestion can be scaled up to the level of animal behavioural choices.
我们测试了这样一种观点,即反刍动物会根据觅食效率将其进食时间分配到不同的栖息地斑块。我们在一个围栏里用了五只圈养的马鹿(赤鹿),围栏里种植了四种处于不同生长阶段的梯牧草(猫尾草)。成熟的草皮生物量更高,但营养质量低于幼嫩的草皮。在七次试验的每一次中,我们观察了在每种处理方式下花费的进食时间。我们测量了观察到的时间与来自两个在优化策略上不同(最大化与匹配)的替代假设以及第三个零假设的预测之间的拟合优度。我们使用两种替代指标来检验这些假设:可消化蛋白质以及可消化干物质或能量。尽管可消化蛋白质浓度和干物质消化率高度相关(r = 0.763,P < 0.001),但可消化蛋白质范围更广,这使其成为衡量饲料质量更为敏感的指标。在所有动物和试验中,进食时间的分布与可消化蛋白质的估计摄入率紧密匹配(R = 0.899)。其他假设被拒绝。这些结果具有重要的生态学意义,表明了食物在反刍动物栖息地选择中的潜在作用,并且简单的饲料摄入和消化机制模型可以扩展到动物行为选择的层面。