Rejmánek M
Department of Botany, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Oecologia. 1992 Mar;89(3):454-456. doi: 10.1007/BF00317426.
Prins and Douglas-Hamilton (1990) analyzed data based on nine census counts of large herbivore species in Lake Manyara National Park, northern Tanzania, over the period 1959-1984. Their major conclusion was that even if individual species-showed large fluctuations in numbers, the different species compensated the fluctuations of the other species in a way resulting in a constancy of total herbivore biomass, constancy of plant biomass consumption, and "overall stability of the system under natural conditions". The authors believed that they had found a support for this view by calculating the "stability index" based on correlations between numbers of large herbivores. In this paper I show that Prins and Douglas-Hamilton's calculation of the stability index was not justified. Grazing and browsing pressure by large herbivores in Lake Manyara National Park seems to be remarkably constant. However, available information does not allow any rigorous conclusions about the stability of this community. We need more data from other systems dominated by large herbivores to be able to make comparisons and to be able to say which systems are more stable and in what sense.
普林斯和道格拉斯 - 汉密尔顿(1990年)分析了1959年至1984年期间坦桑尼亚北部曼雅拉湖国家公园大型食草动物物种九次普查的数据。他们的主要结论是,即使个别物种数量出现大幅波动,不同物种也会以某种方式补偿其他物种的波动,从而使食草动物总生物量保持恒定,植物生物量消耗保持恒定,并且“在自然条件下系统总体稳定”。作者认为,通过基于大型食草动物数量之间的相关性计算“稳定性指数”,他们找到了这一观点的支持依据。在本文中,我表明普林斯和道格拉斯 - 汉密尔顿对稳定性指数的计算是不合理的。曼雅拉湖国家公园大型食草动物的啃食和放牧压力似乎非常恒定。然而,现有信息并不足以对这个群落的稳定性得出任何严谨的结论。我们需要来自其他大型食草动物主导系统的更多数据,以便能够进行比较,并能够说明哪些系统更稳定以及在何种意义上更稳定。