Do birch-feeding caterpillars make the right feeding choices?

The effects of leaf quality on caterpillar performance are frequently investigated, as are the feeding preferences of caterpillars, but rarely are the two considered together to see how preferences match performance. I looked at the preferences and performance of the specialist feeder Achlya flavicornis and the generalist Spilosoma luteum on Betula pendula leaves which were artificially damaged, mined or left undamaged, and on leaves of different ages. Often feeding preferences were not for the leaf types that gave faster development, larger pupae or greater survival. A. flavicornis preferred medium aged to older leaves though medium aged leaves produced smaller pupae. They did not discriminate between young and medium aged leaves, though larvae fed young leaves developed more slowly, and had lower survival and lower adult emergence. S. luteum larvae did not discriminate between damaged and undamaged leaves, though feeding on damaged leaves gave smaller pupae and lower adult emergence. I suggest that generalists like S. luteum might be unable to make feeding choices between leaves that are on the same tree and vary only slightly because populations are exposed to much greater variation across the wide range of potential food plants individuals may encounter. Possible differences in within-plant feeding selectivity between generalists and specialists should be investigated. A. flavicornis is a leaftier for which selection of a suitable leaf for tying could be more important in the first instance than feeding considerations. Larvae preferred younger to older leaves for tying, and larvae tended to feed on the tied leaves, so tying preferences explain the initial feeding preferences.