Andronowski Janna M, Mundorff Amy Z, Pratt Isaac V, Davoren Jon M, Cooper David M L
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Department of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Molecular human identification has conventionally focused on DNA sampling from dense, weight-bearing cortical bone tissue, typically from femora or tibiae. A comparison of skeletal elements from three contemporary individuals demonstrated that elements with high quantities of cancellous bone yielded nuclear DNA at the highest rates, suggesting that preferentially sampling cortical bone may be suboptimal (Mundorff & Davoren, 2014). Despite these findings, the reason for the differential DNA yields between cortical and cancellous bone tissues remains unknown. The primary goal of this work is to ascertain whether differences in bone microstructure can be used to explain differential nuclear DNA yield among bone tissue types observed by Mundorff and Davoren (2014), with a focus on osteocytes and the three-dimensional (3D) quantification of their associated lacunae. Osteocytes and other bone cells are recognized to house DNA in bone tissue, thus examining the density of their lacunae may explain why nuclear DNA yield rates differ among bone tissue types. Lacunae were visualized and quantified using synchrotron radiation-based micro-Computed Tomographic imaging (SR micro-CT). Volumes of interest (VOIs) from cortical and cancellous bone tissues (n=129) were comparatively analyzed from the three skeletons sampled for Mundorff and Davoren's (2014) study. Analyses tested the primary hypothesis that the abundance and density of osteocytes (inferred from their lacunar spaces) vary between cortical and cancellous bone tissue types. Results demonstrated that osteocyte lacunar abundance and density vary between cortical and cancellous bone tissue types, with cortical bone VOIs containing a higher lacunar abundance and density. We found that the osteocyte lacunar density values are independent of nuclear DNA yield, suggesting an alternative explanation for the higher nuclear DNA yields from bones with greater quantities of cancellous bone tissue. The use of SR micro-CT allowed for a scale of analysis that revealed a high range of variation in lacunar abundance in both tissue types. Moreover, high-resolution SR micro-CT imaging revealed potential soft tissue remnants within marrow spaces not visible macroscopically. It is hypothesized that soft tissue remnants observed among the trabeculae of skeletal elements with high quantities of cancellous bone tissue are responsible for the high nuclear DNA yields. These findings have significant implications for bone-sample selection for nuclear DNA analysis in a forensic context when skeletal remains are recovered from the ground surface.
传统上,人类分子识别主要集中于从致密的、承重的皮质骨组织中采集DNA样本,通常采集股骨或胫骨的样本。对三名当代个体的骨骼元素进行比较后发现,松质骨含量高的骨骼元素产生核DNA的比率最高,这表明优先采集皮质骨样本可能并非最佳选择(蒙多夫和达沃伦,2014年)。尽管有这些发现,但皮质骨和松质骨组织之间DNA产量存在差异的原因仍然未知。这项研究的主要目的是确定骨微观结构的差异是否可以用来解释蒙多夫和达沃伦(2014年)观察到的不同骨组织类型之间核DNA产量的差异,重点是骨细胞及其相关腔隙的三维(3D)量化。骨细胞和其他骨细胞被认为在骨组织中储存DNA,因此检查它们腔隙的密度可能解释为什么核DNA产量在不同骨组织类型之间存在差异。使用基于同步辐射的显微计算机断层扫描成像(SR显微CT)对腔隙进行可视化和量化。从蒙多夫和达沃伦(2014年)研究中采集的三具骨骼中,对皮质骨和松质骨组织的感兴趣体积(VOI)(n = 129)进行了比较分析。分析检验了主要假设,即骨细胞的丰度和密度(从其腔隙空间推断)在皮质骨和松质骨组织类型之间存在差异。结果表明,骨细胞腔隙的丰度和密度在皮质骨和松质骨组织类型之间存在差异,皮质骨VOI的腔隙丰度和密度更高。我们发现骨细胞腔隙密度值与核DNA产量无关,这表明了对松质骨组织含量较高的骨骼核DNA产量较高的另一种解释。SR显微CT的使用实现了一种分析尺度,揭示了两种组织类型中腔隙丰度的高度变化范围。此外,高分辨率SR显微CT成像揭示了骨髓腔内肉眼不可见的潜在软组织残余物。据推测,在松质骨组织含量高的骨骼元素小梁中观察到的软组织残余物是核DNA产量高的原因。这些发现对于从地表找回骨骼遗骸时法医背景下核DNA分析的骨样本选择具有重要意义。