Stojkovic Lalosevic Milica, Stankovic Sanja, Stojkovic Mirjana, Markovic Velimir, Dimitrijevic Ivan, Lalosevic Jovan, Petrovic Jelena, Brankovic Marija, Pavlovic Markovic Aleksandra, Krivokapic Zoran
Clinic of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Hell J Nucl Med. 2017 Jan-Apr;20(1):41-45. doi: 10.1967/s002449910505. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
This study was designed to investigate the efficiency of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate cancer antigen (CA19-9) levels for diagnosing synchronous liver metastases and lymph node in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients.
A total of 300 patients with histologically diagnosed CRC were included in this study between May 2014 and March 2015. The data were obtained prospectively from patient's medical records: medical history, demographics, tumor location, differentiation (grade), depth of the tumor (T), lymph node metastases (N), distant metastases (M), lymphatics, venous and perineural invasion, and disease stage. Tumor markers were measured with an electrochemiluminescent assay and the reference value was 5ng/ml for CEA and for Ca19-9, 37u/ml.
There was A high statistically significant difference in the levels of serum CEA and CA19-9 between different disease stages of CRC (P<0.001). Regarding different T stages of CRC, We noticed a significant statistical difference in CEA (stage I 3.76±8.73; II 5.68±17.27, III 7.56±14.81, and IV 70.90±253.23) and CA 19-9 levels (stage I 9.65±11.03, II 9.83±11.09; III 19.58±36.91, and IV 228.9±985.38, respectively). The mean CEA and CA19-9 serum levels were significantly higher in patients with regional lymph nodes involvement (CEA 37.21±177.85 vs 4.79±9.90, CA19-9 119.51±687.71 VS 12.24±17.69, respectively, P<0.05) and in liver metastases (CEA 86.56±277.65 vs. 5.98±12.98, and CA19-9 273.27±1073.46 vs. 4.98±3142, respectively, with P<0.001) in comparison to patients without lymph node involvement and liver metastases. We noticed a cut-off value for lymph nodes involvement, for CEA and CA 19-9, 3.5 ng/mL and 7.5 U/mL, respectively. While, a cut-off value for the presence of synchronous liver metastases of these two markers was 3.5ng/mL AND 5.5 U/mL.
Our study showed that tumor makers, CEA and CA19-9, can be used as diagnostic factors regarding the severity of CRC specifically to suggest metastatic disease in CRC.
本研究旨在探讨术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类癌抗原(CA19 - 9)水平对诊断结直肠癌(CRC)患者同时性肝转移和淋巴结转移的效能。
2014年5月至2015年3月期间,本研究共纳入300例经组织学确诊的CRC患者。数据前瞻性地取自患者病历:病史、人口统计学资料、肿瘤位置、分化程度(分级)、肿瘤深度(T)、淋巴结转移(N)、远处转移(M)、淋巴管、静脉和神经周围浸润以及疾病分期。采用电化学发光法检测肿瘤标志物,CEA的参考值为5ng/ml,CA19 - 9的参考值为37u/ml。
CRC不同疾病分期之间血清CEA和CA19 - 9水平存在高度统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。关于CRC的不同T分期,我们注意到CEA(I期3.76±8.73;II期5.68±17.27,III期7.56±14.81,IV期70.90±253.23)和CA19 - 9水平(I期9.65±11.03,II期9.83±11.09;III期19.58±36.91,IV期228.9±985.38)存在显著统计学差异。与无区域淋巴结受累和肝转移的患者相比,区域淋巴结受累患者(CEA分别为37.21±177.85 vs 4.79±9.90,CA19 - 9分别为119.51±687.71 VS 12.24±17.69,P<0.05)和肝转移患者(CEA分别为86.56±277.65 vs. 5.98±12.98,CA19 - 9分别为273.27±1073.46 vs. 4.98±31.42,P<0.001)的CEA和CA19 - 9血清平均水平显著更高。我们注意到淋巴结受累时CEA和CA19 - 9的截断值分别为3.5 ng/mL和7.5 U/mL。而这两种标志物存在同时性肝转移时的截断值为3.5ng/mL和5.5 U/mL。
我们的研究表明,肿瘤标志物CEA和CA19 - 9可作为评估CRC严重程度的诊断因素,特别是用于提示CRC中的转移性疾病。