Sun Doohoon, Park Byeong-Seop, Jang Gun-Il, Lee Bongjoo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Sun Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
Hip Pelvis. 2017 Mar;29(1):62-67. doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.1.62. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of different operation methods applied to each of these groups.
Using Evan's classification, we defined an unstable intertrochanteric fracture as those characterized as stage 4 or 5. Of the 137 patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture with osteoporosis (bone mineral density, <-2.5) between March 2014 and October 2015, 63 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Next, patients were divided into three groups based on their greater trochanter fracture patterns (discerned with three-dimensional computed tomography images); different fixation methods were applied to each group by a single orthopaedic surgeon.
Taken as a whole, 50 out of 63 patients experienced no reduction in walking distance in their daily lives. Harris hip score increased from 74.8 to 85.7 point and we considered this a relatively good result. Radiologically, we observed complete bone union in 62 cases (98.4%); the lone exception was in a patient who experienced osteolysis. There were also 3 cases who removed greater trochanter reattachment device due to broken implant and 1 case of dislocation.
The different fixation methods applied to three distinct groups with varying fractures patterns were successful in achieving proper reduction and fixation of greater trochanteric fractures. We also observed reduced bone union periods when arthroplasty was performed in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Lastly, we believe these approaches may also aid in achieving early ambulation and early rehabilitations.
我们对因不稳定型股骨转子间骨折伴大转子骨块而接受髋关节置换术的患者进行了一项研究。根据骨折类型将患者分为三组后,我们评估了应用于每组的不同手术方法的临床和放射学结果。
采用埃文斯分类法,我们将不稳定型转子间骨折定义为4期或5期骨折。在2014年3月至2015年10月期间出现骨质疏松(骨密度,<-2.5)的转子间骨折的137例患者中,63例符合纳入标准并纳入本研究。接下来,根据患者的大转子骨折类型(通过三维计算机断层扫描图像识别)将患者分为三组;由一名骨科医生对每组应用不同的固定方法。
总体而言,63例患者中有50例在日常生活中的步行距离没有减少。Harris髋关节评分从74.8分提高到85.7分,我们认为这是一个相对较好的结果。在放射学上,我们观察到62例(98.4%)实现了完全骨愈合;唯一的例外是一名发生骨溶解的患者。也有3例因植入物断裂而取出大转子重新附着装置,1例发生脱位。
应用于具有不同骨折类型的三个不同组的不同固定方法成功地实现了大转子骨折的适当复位和固定。我们还观察到,对不稳定型转子间骨折患者进行关节置换术时,骨愈合时间缩短。最后,我们认为这些方法也可能有助于实现早期下床活动和早期康复。