Chaitanya V Sundeep, Cuello Luz, Das Madhusmita, Sudharsan A, Ganesan Pavithrra, Kanmani K, Rajan Lakshmi, Ebenezer Mannam
Division of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Schieffelin Institute of Health Research and Leprosy Centre, Karigiri, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Biology, Regents Hall of Natural Science, Northfield, MN 55057, USA.
Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/2212-5531.201885.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Clinical diagnosis of indeterminate and tuberculoid leprosy is often difficult due to limited and confounding signs and symptoms. In the current study, we evaluated the utility of new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using Mycobacterium leprae-specific DNA sequences in the pseudogene regions of ML1545, ML2180, and ML2179 for PCR-based diagnosis of indeterminate leprosy (IND) and leprosy cases across the immunological spectrum. The sensitivity was compared with that of RLEP PCR.
DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded skin biopsy specimens of 220 leprosy cases, which were divided into IND (41), tuberculoid form (3), borderline tuberculoid (42), midborderline (3), borderline lepromatous (n=59), and lepromatous leprosy (72) cases. PCR positivity of both multiplex and RLEP PCR were compared in all the samples. A decision tree was constructed using the classification and regression trees algorithm to predict the probability of PCR positivity with the new multiplex PCR scheme in various clinical groups of leprosy. Sensitivity of each pseudogene target was determined using real-time PCR assays, and specificity was confirmed by PCR amplification of DNA extracted from three other mycobacterial species and skin biopsies of 44 non-leprosy cases.
A multiplex PCR positivity of 75.61% was noted in IND cases when compared to that of 58.54% using RLEP PCR (P < 0.05). Enhanced multiplex PCR positivity was noted across various clinical groups in comparison to RLEP PCR. The decision tree classifier has predicted statistically significant probability for multiplex PCR positivity among RLEP-PCR negative group and clinical groups with a low bacillary load.
This new multiplex PCR scheme can support the diagnosis of indeterminate and tuberculoid forms of leprosy with limited clinical manifestations and can be implemented in basic clinical/diagnostic setting that possess conventional PCR facilities.
目的/背景:由于体征和症状有限且易混淆,对未定类麻风及结核样型麻风进行临床诊断往往具有难度。在本研究中,我们评估了利用麻风分枝杆菌特异性DNA序列,针对ML1545、ML2180和ML2179假基因区域进行新型多重聚合酶链反应(PCR),用于基于PCR的未定类麻风(IND)及全免疫谱麻风病例诊断的效用。将其敏感性与RLEP PCR的敏感性进行了比较。
从220例麻风病例的石蜡包埋皮肤活检标本中提取DNA,这些病例分为IND(41例)、结核样型(3例)、界线结核样型(42例)、中间界线型(3例)、界线类偏瘤型(59例)和瘤型麻风(72例)。比较所有样本中多重PCR和RLEP PCR的阳性率。使用分类与回归树算法构建决策树,以预测新型多重PCR方案在不同临床类型麻风患者中PCR阳性的概率。使用实时PCR检测确定每个假基因靶点的敏感性,并通过对从其他三种分枝杆菌提取的DNA以及44例非麻风病例的皮肤活检样本进行PCR扩增来确认特异性。
IND病例中多重PCR阳性率为75.61%,而RLEP PCR为58.54%(P<0.05)。与RLEP PCR相比,各临床类型中多重PCR阳性率均有所提高。决策树分类器预测,在RLEP-PCR阴性组及细菌载量低的临床类型中,多重PCR阳性具有统计学意义。
这种新型多重PCR方案能够辅助诊断临床表现有限的未定类和结核样型麻风,且可在具备常规PCR设施的基层临床/诊断机构中实施。