• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺外科预防性腹部引流的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery.

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Study Centre of the German Surgical Society, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):660-668. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10505. Epub 2017 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10505
PMID:28318008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intra-abdominal drains are frequently used after pancreatic surgery whereas their benefit in other gastrointestinal operations has been questioned. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare abdominal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science electronic databases were searched systematically to identify RCTs comparing abdominal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery. Two independent reviewers critically appraised the studies and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to aggregate dichotomous outcomes, and weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes. Summary effect measures were presented together with their 95 per cent confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Some 711 patients from three RCTs were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 2·0 per cent in the drain group versus 3·4 per cent after no drainage (OR 0·68, 95 per cent c.i. 0·26 to 1·79; P = 0·43). The morbidity rate was 65·6 per cent in the drain group and 62·0 per cent in the no-drain group (OR 1·17, 0·86 to 1·60; P = 0·31). Clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas were seen in 11·5 per cent of patients in the drain group and 9·5 per cent in the no-drain group. Reinterventions, intra-abdominal abscesses and duration of hospital stay also showed no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic resection with, or without abdominal drainage results in similar rates of mortality, morbidity and reintervention.

摘要

背景

胰腺手术后常使用腹腔引流,但其他胃肠道手术后引流的益处存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较胰腺手术后引流与不引流的效果。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 电子数据库,以确定比较胰腺手术后引流与不引流的 RCT。两名独立评审员对研究进行严格评估并提取数据。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用比值比(OR)汇总二分类结局,使用加权均数差汇总连续结局。汇总效应量及其 95%置信区间一并呈现。

结果

共有 3 项 RCT 的 711 名患者纳入分析。引流组的 30 天死亡率为 2.0%,无引流组为 3.4%(OR 0.68,95%CI 0.26 至 1.79;P=0.43)。引流组的发病率为 65.6%,无引流组为 62.0%(OR 1.17,0.86 至 1.60;P=0.31)。引流组中有 11.5%的患者出现临床相关的胰瘘,无引流组为 9.5%。再次干预、腹腔脓肿和住院时间在两组间也无显著差异。

结论

胰腺切除术加或不加腹腔引流的死亡率、发病率和再次干预率相似。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery.胰腺外科预防性腹部引流的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):660-668. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10505. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 21(8):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub2.
3
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术的预防性腹腔引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 21;10(10):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub3.
4
Risk-benefit assessment of closed intra-abdominal drains after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the current state of evidence.胰腺手术后闭管式腹腔引流的风险效益评估:系统评价和荟萃分析评估当前证据状况。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;396(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-010-0716-0. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
5
No Need for Routine Drainage After Pancreatic Head Resection: The Dual-Center, Randomized, Controlled PANDRA Trial (ISRCTN04937707).胰腺头部切除术后无需常规引流:一项来自两个中心的、随机的、对照的 PANDRA 试验(ISRCTN04937707)。
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):528-37. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001859.
6
Results of a randomized controlled trial comparing closed-suction drains versus passive gravity drains after pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术后使用闭管式引流与被动重力引流的随机对照试验结果。
Surgery. 2018 Nov;164(5):1057-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage after pancreatic resection.胰腺切除术后预防性腹腔引流的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 14;21(18):5719-34. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5719.
8
Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients.早期拔除预防性引流管可降低胰头切除患者腹腔内感染风险:对104例连续患者的前瞻性研究
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218077.14035.a6.
9
Pancreaticoduodenectomy Can Be Performed Safely with Rare Employment of Surgical Drains.胰十二指肠切除术可安全施行,手术引流管使用较少。
Am Surg. 2017 Mar 1;83(3):265-273.
10
Pancreatic resection: drain or no drain?胰腺切除术:置管引流还是不置管引流?
Surgery. 2013 Nov;154(5):1069-77. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.017. Epub 2013 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.胰腺手术中的预防性腹腔引流:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Aug 29;410(1):255. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03763-z.
2
Drainage and irrigation on demand may decrease severe septic complications and mortality in pancreatic resections.按需引流和灌洗可能会降低胰腺切除术后严重脓毒症并发症和死亡率。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 11;409(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03464-z.
3
Intraperitoneal prophylactic drain after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an Italian survey.
胰十二指肠切除术后腹腔预防性引流:一项意大利调查。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):923-932. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01836-0. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Early vs late drain removal after pancreatic resection-a systematic review and meta-analysis.胰腺切除术后早期与晚期拔除引流管的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 17;408(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03053-6.
5
Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care.《围手术期紧急剖腹术患者管理的共识指南:术后加速康复(ERAS)协会推荐意见第 2 部分-紧急剖腹术:围术期和术后护理》。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):1850-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07020-6. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
6
Comparison of the complications of passive drainage and active suction drainage after pancreatectomy: A meta-analysis.胰十二指肠切除术后被动引流与主动吸引引流并发症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 20;10:1122558. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1122558. eCollection 2023.
7
Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study.胰十二指肠切除术后早期拔除引流管的安全性评估:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:993901. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.993901. eCollection 2022.
8
The Role of Abdominal Drain Cultures in Managing Abdominal Infections.腹腔引流液培养在腹部感染管理中的作用
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 20;11(5):697. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050697.
9
Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.胰腺手术预防性腹部引流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 18;12(12):CD010583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010583.pub5.
10
Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review.努力制定胰腺移植的加速康复外科(ERAS)方案:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 1;10(7):1418. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071418.