a Department of Family Social Science , University of Minnesota.
b Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect , University of Colorado School of Medicine.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019;48(sup1):S194-S201. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1295379. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
The current study extends research on the impact of the Fostering Healthy Futures program (Taussig & Culhane, 2010), a 9-month mentoring and skills group preventive intervention for maltreated children, by examining whether the effect of Fostering Healthy Futures is moderated by children's baseline risk exposure (i.e., number of adverse childhood experiences). Participants included 156 racially and ethnically diverse children (ages 9-11, 50.7% female) recently placed in foster care due to maltreatment who were randomized to intervention or control conditions. Baseline and 6-month postintervention measures included a multi-informant index of mental health functioning and youth-reported symptoms of posttraumatic stress, dissociation, coping skills, social-acceptance, global self-worth, social support, and quality of life. A previously published, empirically derived risk index was used to assess level of exposure to 6 adverse childhood experiences (i.e., physical abuse, sexual abuse, removal from a single parent household, high level of exposure to community violence, and high numbers of caregiver and school transitions). Significant Intervention × Risk interactions were observed in regression models predicting 6-month postintervention symptoms of posttraumatic stress (β = .38, p < .001) and dissociation (β = .30, p < .01). Among children with low to moderate levels of risk, intervention participants evidenced fewer symptoms, whereas intervention participants with high levels of risk did not differ from the control group. The results of this study suggest that maltreated children exposed to high numbers of adverse childhood experiences may not experience the same reduction in trauma symptoms postintervention relative to children exposed to fewer adversities.
本研究扩展了 Fostering Healthy Futures 计划(Taussig & Culhane,2010)对影响的研究,该计划是一项针对受虐待儿童的 9 个月辅导和技能小组预防干预措施,通过检验 Fostering Healthy Futures 的效果是否受到儿童基线风险暴露(即,遭受不良童年经历的次数)的调节。参与者包括 156 名不同种族和民族的儿童(9-11 岁,50.7%为女性),他们因虐待而最近被安置在寄养家庭中,并随机分配到干预或对照组。基线和 6 个月后的干预措施包括心理健康功能的多信息指标和青年报告的创伤后应激、分离、应对技能、社会接受、自我价值感、社会支持和生活质量的症状。使用以前发表的经验衍生风险指数来评估 6 种不良童年经历(即身体虐待、性虐待、从单亲家庭中分离、社区暴力的高暴露率以及照顾者和学校过渡的高次数)的暴露水平。在预测 6 个月后创伤后应激症状(β=.38,p<.001)和分离症状(β=.30,p<.01)的回归模型中观察到显著的干预×风险相互作用。在风险水平较低和中等的儿童中,干预组的症状较少,而高风险的干预组与对照组没有差异。这项研究的结果表明,暴露于大量不良童年经历的受虐待儿童在干预后可能不会经历相同程度的创伤症状减轻,而暴露于较少逆境的儿童则会经历相同程度的创伤症状减轻。