• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算性面板反应性抗体可预测心脏移植等待名单上的结局。

Calculated panel-reactive antibody predicts outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list.

机构信息

Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jul;36(7):787-796. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.015
PMID:28318744
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sensitized heart transplant candidates spend more time and have higher mortality on the waiting list. Although the calculated panel-reactive antibody (CPRA) value is used to assign allocation priority to kidney transplant candidates in the United States, the relationship between CPRA and outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list is unknown.

METHODS

A data set of patients listed for heart transplant with unacceptable human leukocyte antigens (HLA) entered was obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing. The study cohort was composed of 3,855 adult candidates listed for heart transplant between 2006 and 2013 with active waiting time. The cohort was divided into 5 groups by increasing CPRA. Outcomes were assessed using competing risks and sub-hazard regression analyses.

RESULTS

In each group of successively higher CPRA, the percentage of candidates who received a transplant decreased, whereas the percentage of those who were still waiting for a transplant increased, as did the percentage of those removed from the waiting list or had died. The group of candidates with a CPRA >80% displayed a markedly decreased incidence of transplantation (hazard ratio 0.37) and an increased risk of removal from the waiting list or death (hazard ratio 2.18) as compared to those with CPRA of ≤10%.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensitized heart transplant candidates are at high risk of adverse outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list. Clinicians should strive to minimize the CPRA by maximizing specificity in the selection of HLA antigens to exclude. The optimal clinical approach for candidates with high CPRA requires further study.

摘要

背景

致敏的心脏移植候选者在等待名单上花费的时间更长,死亡率更高。尽管在美国,计算出的群体反应性抗体 (CPRA) 值用于为肾移植候选者分配分配优先级,但 CPRA 与心脏移植等待名单上的结果之间的关系尚不清楚。

方法

从器官共享联合网络获得了一份不可接受的人类白细胞抗原 (HLA) 列于心脏移植名单的数据。研究队列由 2006 年至 2013 年期间活跃等待时间的 3855 名成年心脏移植候选者组成。该队列根据 CPRA 递增分为 5 组。使用竞争风险和亚危险回归分析评估结果。

结果

在 CPRA 逐渐升高的每组中,接受移植的候选者百分比下降,而仍在等待移植的候选者百分比增加,从等待名单中除名或死亡的候选者百分比也增加。与 CPRA≤10%的候选者相比,CPRA>80%的候选者移植的发生率明显降低(危险比 0.37),并且从等待名单中除名或死亡的风险增加(危险比 2.18)。

结论

致敏的心脏移植候选者在心脏移植等待名单上发生不良结果的风险很高。临床医生应通过最大限度地提高 HLA 抗原选择的特异性来努力降低 CPRA,以排除抗原。高 CPRA 候选者的最佳临床方法需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Calculated panel-reactive antibody predicts outcomes on the heart transplant waiting list.计算性面板反应性抗体可预测心脏移植等待名单上的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Jul;36(7):787-796. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.02.015. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
2
Association between Allosensitization and Waiting List Outcomes among Adult Lung Transplant Candidates in the United States.美国成人肺移植候选者群体中同种异体致敏与等待名单结果的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jul;16(7):846-852. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201810-713OC.
3
Impact of organ prioritization for immunologic sensitization and waiting times for heart transplantation.免疫致敏和心脏移植等待时间对器官优先排序的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Mar;38(3):285-294. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Candidates with High Panel-Reactive Antibodies.将已故捐赠者的肾脏分配给高群体反应性抗体的候选者。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):505-11. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07720715. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
Increased Calculated Panel Reactive Antigen Is Associated With Increased Waitlist Time and Mortality in Lung Transplantation.计算性 panel reactive antigen 升高与肺移植等待时间延长和死亡率升高相关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Aug;110(2):414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.061. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Association between calculated panel reactive antibody and waitlist outcomes in the 2018 heart allocation system.计算面板反应抗体与 2018 年心脏分配系统候补者结局的关系。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 Oct;42(10):1469-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2023.05.018. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
7
Parsing the 100% calculated panel reactive antibody kidney transplant candidates: Who gets transplanted?剖析100%计算得出的群体反应性抗体肾移植候选者:谁能接受移植?
HLA. 2020 Jan;95(1):23-29. doi: 10.1111/tan.13692. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
8
Calculated panel reactive antibody with decimals: A refined metric of access to transplantation for highly sensitized candidates.带小数的计算性群体反应性抗体:高度致敏候选者移植可及性的优化指标。
Hum Immunol. 2017 Mar;78(3):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
9
Effect of Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody Value on Waitlist Outcomes for Lung Transplant Candidates.计算得出的群体反应性抗体值对肺移植候选者等待名单结果的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2019 Jun 28;24:383-392. doi: 10.12659/AOT.915769.
10
The Introduction of cPRA and Its Impact on Access to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation for Highly Sensitized Patients in Australia.cPRA 的引入及其对澳大利亚高致敏患者获得已故供体肾移植的影响。
Transplantation. 2021 Jun 1;105(6):1317-1325. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003410.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential Effects of Brain Death and Circulatory Death on Myocardial Integrity and Transplant Outcomes.脑死亡和循环死亡对心肌完整性及移植结果的不同影响。
J Surg Res (Houst). 2025;8(3):416-435. doi: 10.26502/jsr.10020466. Epub 2025 Aug 20.
2
Days alive and out of the hospital at 1 year following heart transplant: Comparing donation after brain death versus after circulatory death.心脏移植术后1年存活且出院天数:脑死亡后捐赠与循环死亡后捐赠的比较。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jun 26;9:100330. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100330. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Novel pretransplant desensitization strategies in heart transplantation.
心脏移植中新型的移植前脱敏策略。
JHLT Open. 2025 Mar 6;8:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100242. eCollection 2025 May.
4
The Outcomes of Highly Sensitized Heart Transplant Patients in South Korea: Insights and Perspectives.韩国高敏心脏移植患者的结局:见解与展望。
Korean Circ J. 2024 Jun;54(6):336-338. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2024.0122.
5
Race, ethnicity, ancestry, and aspects that impact HLA data and matching for transplant.种族、族裔、血统以及影响人类白细胞抗原(HLA)数据和移植配型的因素。
Front Genet. 2024 Mar 15;15:1375352. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1375352. eCollection 2024.
6
Rejection Requiring Treatment within the First Year following Heart Transplantation: The UNOS Insight.心脏移植术后第一年需要治疗的排斥反应:器官共享联合网络的见解
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 29;14(1):52. doi: 10.3390/jpm14010052.
7
Selection and Interpretation of Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Transplantation.心脏移植中的分子诊断选择与解读。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 22;148(8):679-694. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.062847. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
8
Anti-HLA antibodies in recipients of CD19 versus BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy.接受 CD19 与 BCMA 靶向 CAR T 细胞治疗的患者中的抗 HLA 抗体。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Mar;23(3):416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.001. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
9
Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation.移植前后超免疫患者临床管理的新见解。
Curr Res Immunol. 2023 Jan 23;4:100056. doi: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100056. eCollection 2023.
10
Eplet-Predicted Antigens: An Attempt to Introduce Eplets into Unacceptable Antigen Determination and Calculated Panel-Reactive Antibody Calculation Facilitating Kidney Allocation.表位预测抗原:将表位引入不可接受抗原测定及计算群体反应性抗体以促进肾分配的尝试。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;12(12):2983. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122983.