O'Reilly D A, McPherson S J, Sinclair M T, Smith N
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD), London, UK; Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK; School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD), London, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Pancreatology. 2017 May-Jun;17(3):329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) is an independent organisation whose remit is to review the quality of medical and surgical care provided in the United Kingdom. We undertook a review into the care provided to patients treated for acute pancreatitis during a 6 month study period between 1st January and 30th June 2014. This included assessment of care at an organisational level, clinical level within hospitals and external peer review. From a random sample, 712 patients underwent hospital clinician review and 418 patients had external peer review. Overall, we found that there was room for improvement in care in over 50% of patients with acute pancreatitis. Case reviewers felt that efforts to prevent recurrent episodes due to gallstones and alcohol were inadequate as 21% of patients in the study had one or more previous episodes of acute pancreatitis. Aspects of general care where improvements could be made include better antibiotic stewardship; as 1/5 of patients were considered to have been given antibiotics unnecessarily. Overall management of the patients' nutrition was considered adequate by the case reviewers in only 85% of cases. The use of an early warning score was omitted in 31% of emergency department admissions. Recommendations include standardised early warning scoring systems to be used throughout the hospital and commenced in the emergency department. The development of better networking arrangements and regional pancreatitis units, with shared management guidelines, is also essential to improve the coordination of care.
国家患者预后与死亡保密调查机构(NCEPOD)是一个独立组织,其职责是审查英国提供的医疗和外科护理质量。我们对2014年1月1日至6月30日这6个月研究期间接受急性胰腺炎治疗的患者所接受的护理进行了审查。这包括在组织层面、医院内部临床层面以及外部同行评审中对护理的评估。从随机样本中,712名患者接受了医院临床医生的审查,418名患者接受了外部同行评审。总体而言,我们发现超过50%的急性胰腺炎患者的护理仍有改进空间。病例评审人员认为,预防因胆结石和酒精导致的复发的努力不足,因为研究中有21%的患者曾有过一次或多次急性胰腺炎发作。可以改进的一般护理方面包括更好地管理抗生素使用;因为五分之一的患者被认为接受了不必要的抗生素治疗。病例评审人员仅在85%的病例中认为患者营养的总体管理是充分的。31%的急诊科入院患者未使用早期预警评分。建议包括在整个医院使用标准化的早期预警评分系统,并在急诊科开始使用。建立更好的网络安排和区域胰腺炎治疗单位,并制定共享的管理指南,对于改善护理协调也至关重要。