Bonney Phillip A, Burks Joshua D, Conner Andrew K, Glenn Chad A, Baker Cordell M, Cheema Ahmed A, Archer Jacob B, Buster Bryan E, Albrecht Roxie M, Bohnstedt Bradley N
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jul;41:111-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.02.045. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
We sought to assess the rate of CTA-diagnosed vertebral artery injury in patients with isolated transverse process fractures, with and without extension into the transverse foramen, in the blunt-trauma population served by our hospital. We queried our universities trauma registry between January 2009 and July 2014 for ICD-9 codes pertaining to cervical spine fractures. Of 330 patients identified, 45 patients had fractures limited to the transverse process and were selected for the study population. For each patient identified, demographics, injury mechanism, imaging reports, angiography findings, and treatments were recorded. In total, 69 fractures were identified in 45 patients. Of the 45 patients, 15 (33%) had transverse process fractures at multiple cervical levels. 23/45 (51%) patients had at least one fracture extending into TF. Four patients with transverse process fractures and one patient without transverse process fractures were diagnosed with vertebral artery injury by CT angiogram (17.4% vs. 4.5%, p=0.35). The number of transverse process fractures in patients with VAI was greater than those without VAI (3.0 vs. 1.4, p<0.001). None of the 30 patients with any one-level TPF (with or without extension into TF) was diagnosed with VAI (p=0.003). None of 17 patients with isolated C7-level TPFs were diagnosed with VAI (p=0.15). The incidence of cervical VAI was greater in patients with multiple-level TPFs than in patients with single-level TPFs. While patients with a single, isolated TPF have a low probability of VAI, patients with numerous TPF fractures may benefit from CTA.
我们试图评估在我院诊治的钝性创伤患者中,孤立性横突骨折(无论是否延伸至横突孔)患者经CT血管造影(CTA)诊断的椎动脉损伤发生率。我们查询了2009年1月至2014年7月我校创伤登记处中与颈椎骨折相关的ICD - 9编码。在识别出的330例患者中,45例患者骨折局限于横突,被选入研究人群。对于每例识别出的患者,记录其人口统计学资料、损伤机制、影像学报告、血管造影结果及治疗情况。45例患者共识别出69处骨折。45例患者中,15例(33%)在多个颈椎节段发生横突骨折。23/45(51%)例患者至少有一处骨折延伸至横突孔。4例有横突骨折的患者和1例无横突骨折的患者经CT血管造影诊断为椎动脉损伤(17.4%对4.5%,p = 0.35)。椎动脉损伤患者的横突骨折数量多于无椎动脉损伤患者(3.0对1.4,p<0.001)。30例任何单节段横突孔骨折(无论是否延伸至横突孔)患者均未诊断出椎动脉损伤(p = 0.003)。17例孤立的C7节段横突孔骨折患者均未诊断出椎动脉损伤(p = 0.15)。多节段横突孔骨折患者的颈椎椎动脉损伤发生率高于单节段横突孔骨折患者。虽然单一孤立性横突孔骨折患者发生椎动脉损伤的概率较低,但多处横突孔骨折患者可能从CTA检查中获益。